Louisiana 2014 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB496

Introduced
3/10/14  
Refer
3/10/14  
Report Pass
4/8/14  
Report Pass
4/8/14  
Engrossed
4/16/14  
Engrossed
4/16/14  
Refer
4/21/14  
Refer
4/21/14  
Report Pass
5/21/14  
Report Pass
5/21/14  
Enrolled
6/2/14  
Enrolled
6/2/14  
Chaptered
6/23/14  
Passed
6/23/14  

Caption

Provides for limits on certain medical prescriptions. (8/1/14)

Impact

The implementation of SB 496 is poised to have significant implications for state laws concerning prescription practices. By enforcing stricter limits on the dispensing of opioids, the legislation is a response to the increasing concerns related to opioid addiction and abuse across the state. The bill aims to protect patients and enhance public health by ensuring that only licensed practitioners are authorized to provide long-term prescriptions for opioids. This shift marks a critical movement towards more regulated and responsible prescribing habits among medical professionals.

Summary

Senate Bill 496, introduced by Senator Heitmeier, aims to amend existing laws regarding the prescriptions of controlled substances, particularly opioid medications. The bill specifies that pharmacists may only dispense a ten-day supply of certain Schedule II and Schedule III controlled substances if the prescriber is not licensed in Louisiana. This measure intends to limit access to these drugs in an effort to combat opioid misuse and ensure better control over prescription practices. Notably, the bill mandates that pharmacists notify prescribers about the supply dispensed and prohibits further dispensing by the same unlicensed prescriber within sixty days of the initial dispense.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 496 appears generally favorable among those advocating for stricter opioid regulations as a public health necessity. Supporters view the bill as a proactive step towards reducing the risks associated with opioid prescriptions and enhancing patient safety. However, there may be concerns among some prescribers about the implications of the new limitations and the potential burden on their practices, particularly those who have patients requiring long-term pain management. Overall, the legislation reflects a growing trend towards more stringent controls over prescription drugs in response to epidemic levels of substance abuse.

Contention

Debate around SB 496 centers on balancing the need for public safety with the medical community's ability to effectively manage pain. While supporters argue that limiting prescriptions is essential for combating opioid addiction, critics may express concerns about restricting access for patients who genuinely need these medications. Furthermore, there could be logistical challenges for pharmacists and prescribers in adhering to the new regulations. The legislation thus encapsulates a broader societal struggle to address health care needs while preventing misuse of powerful medications.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2789

Health care practitioners: prescriptions: electronic data transmission.

CA AB852

Health care practitioners: electronic prescriptions.

CA AB149

Controlled substances: prescriptions.

TX SB594

Relating to the regulation of prescriptions for controlled substances, including certain procedures applicable to electronic prescriptions for Schedule II controlled substances.

TX HB2246

Relating to certain procedures applicable to electronic prescriptions for Schedule II controlled substances.

TX HB2766

Relating to electronic and other controlled substance prescriptions under the Texas Controlled Substances Act; authorizing a fee.