Provides for the Classroom Protection Act. (gov sig)
Impact
If enacted, this bill will directly influence how classroom discipline is managed across the state. It formalizes the procedure for student removal while establishing a legal framework for parental notification and agency referrals for evaluation and services. By mandating a court hearing after such incidents, the bill emphasizes the need for accountability not only for students but also for educational institutions regarding safety procedures for teacher and student well-being.
Summary
Senate Bill 652, titled the 'Classroom Protection Act', seeks to provide a structured procedure for the removal of students posing a risk of imminent physical harm to teachers or classmates. The bill allows teachers to contact law enforcement for immediate removal of a student under such circumstances. Following a removal, the student's parents or guardians must be notified within an hour, and a court hearing must be held within three school days to assess the student's situation and decide on their educational setting moving forward. This addresses scenarios where a teacher feels threatened or unsafe due to a student's behavior in the classroom.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding SB 652 appears to be a mix of support and concern. Supporters, likely educators and parents, view the bill as essential for ensuring safety in schools, giving teachers the authority they need to maintain a secure learning environment. However, criticisms may arise regarding the potential for misuse of the removal process, the impacts on student education, and general concerns related to the judicial involvement in these disciplinary scenarios. The bill could spark debate about balancing student rights with the need for safety in educational settings.
Contention
Notable points of contention include the potential consequences thus outlined following a student's removal and the judicial process introduced. Critics may argue that mandatory court appearances for students could lead to further stigmatization, with calls for considering alternative approaches to discipline that keep educational continuity in focus. Additionally, questions about the adequacy of the support services referred to in the bill could arise, as communities are often strained for resources, raising doubts about implementation at the local level.
Requires the governing authority of each public school to develop and adopt policies for the installation and operation of video cameras in certain classrooms. (gov sig) (EN INCREASE LF EX See Note)
Requires the use of video cameras in certain classrooms where special education services are provided to certain students with exceptionalities. (gov sig) (OR INCREASE GF EX See Note)
Requires the use of video cameras in classrooms where special education services are provided to certain students with exceptionalities (RE1 INCREASE GF EX See Note)
Requires the use of video cameras in classrooms where special education services are provided to certain students with exceptionalities (OR INCREASE GF EX See Note)
Public education employees; exclusion of students from classroom, provided for; principal authorized to suspend, expel, or recommend for alternative school certain students excluded from classroom; civil and criminal immunity provided to education employees; local boards of education authorized to reimburse or compensate employees for certain legal fees; rebuttable presumption, created; Board of Education, required to adopt rules
Requires the governing authority of each public school to develop and adopt policies for the installation and operation of video cameras in certain classrooms. (gov sig) (EN INCREASE LF EX See Note)