Requests BESE to study and report to the legislature regarding current student discipline policies and possible changes to these policies.
Impact
If implemented, SCR134 aims to prompt a significant shift in how schools approach discipline, advocating for alternative strategies that foster positive behavior rather than exclusionary practices. This resolution aligns with the 'Supportive School Discipline Initiative' launched by federal education and justice departments, which aims to reduce the reliance on suspensions and expulsions. By looking into current policies and their implications, the State Board would be expected to identify areas of reform and propose new measures that keep students within the educational system while addressing behavioral issues constructively.
Summary
SCR134 urges the State Board of Elementary and Secondary Education to review and reconsider current school discipline policies, particularly focusing on the reliance on suspensions and expulsions as disciplinary measures. The resolution emphasizes that creating a safe and effective learning environment is essential for students to succeed academically and socially. It stresses that punitive measures such as suspensions can hinder students' educational progress and disproportionately affect students of color and those with disabilities. The bill highlights the necessity for policies that support students in remaining in school and receiving the guidance needed to improve their behavior.
Sentiment
The sentiment around SCR134 appears to be largely supportive among educators and advocates for more equitable education policies. Many stakeholders recognize the potential benefits of reforming discipline practices to foster an inclusive school climate. However, there may also be concerns from those who believe that stricter disciplinary measures are needed to maintain order and standards within schools. The resolution generally signals a progressive approach to student discipline, aimed at reducing negative outcomes for at-risk populations.
Contention
Notable points of contention surrounding SCR134 might arise regarding the balance between maintaining discipline within schools and ensuring equitable treatment of all students. Critics could argue about the feasibility of implementing alternative disciplinary measures effectively within current school systems. Additionally, there may be differing opinions about what constitutes effective discipline and how to measure success in terms of student behavior and academic outcomes. The bill implies a need for comprehensive data collection and analysis to ensure that any proposed changes are both effective and equitable.
Requests the state Department of Education to study current discipline statutes and policies and make recommendations to the Senate for ways to protect teachers from classroom violence.
Directs public elementary school governing authorities to report to DOE regarding alternative discipline strategies utilized prior to suspending or expelling students in grades Pre-K through five out of school.
To Require School District Boards Of Directors To Include In Student Discipline Policies The Requirement That Schools Conduct An Assessment Of A Student's Adverse Childhood Experiences Before Disciplining A Student.