Provides relative to the Rules of Order of the Senate. (08/01/14)
If enacted, SR168 would notably affect the protocol by which legislative bills and resolutions are introduced, amended, and scheduled for discussion. The amendments to the rule regarding the 'Bagneris Rule' may streamline proceedings. However, they could also impact legislative transparency, as passing over controversial items might limit timely debate on critical issues that require immediate attention or public scrutiny. The adjustments aim to balance the need for efficient legislative operations while maintaining the Senate's commitment to address significant matters effectively.
Senate Resolution No. 168, sponsored by Senator Amedee, proposes amendments and readoptions to specific rules of order within the Louisiana Senate. The aim of this resolution is to enhance the operational efficiency and clarity of the Senate's legislative processes. Key aspects of the proposed amendments involve organizational changes, such as the maintenance of calendars for bills and resolutions, along with adjustments to how legislative instruments are considered and amended during sessions. Particularly, it introduces the 'Bagneris Rule,' which allows for certain controversial instruments to be passed over, retaining their place for future consideration without immediate debate.
Sentiment around SR168 appears mixed. Proponents argue that the amendments will facilitate smoother operations within the Senate, reduce bottlenecks, and lead to more effective time management during sessions. On the other hand, critics express concerns that some changes, especially those introducing the 'Bagneris Rule,' may undermine transparency and thorough examination of legislative proposals, potentially allowing significant issues to evade rigorous discussion.
Notable points of contention amongst lawmakers focus on the implications of the proposed changes to the rules. Opponents highlight the risks associated with the 'Bagneris Rule,' fearing that it may be misused to bypass essential discussions on pressing legislative issues. Additionally, the removal of certain provisions and redefinitions in terminology may raise concerns about inclusivity and clarity in the legislative process. Overall, the resolution incites a broader debate on the balance between legislative efficiency and accountability, reflecting underlying tensions in governance.