Louisiana 2015 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB174

Introduced
3/26/15  
Introduced
3/26/15  
Refer
3/26/15  
Refer
3/26/15  
Refer
4/13/15  
Refer
4/13/15  
Report Pass
4/21/15  
Report Pass
4/21/15  
Engrossed
4/28/15  
Engrossed
4/28/15  
Refer
4/29/15  
Refer
4/29/15  
Report Pass
5/12/15  
Report Pass
5/12/15  
Enrolled
6/2/15  
Enrolled
6/2/15  
Chaptered
6/23/15  

Caption

Provides with respect to the scheduling of controlled dangerous substances

Impact

The implementation of HB 174 will lead to stricter controls over the prescription and dispensing of specific opioid derivatives and controlled substances. By amending sections of the Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Law, the bill aims to enhance the oversight of substances like hydrocodone, affecting pharmacists and healthcare providers. This move is seen as essential towards preventing abuse while ensuring that legitimate medical needs can still be met with appropriate regulations in place.

Summary

House Bill 174 addresses the scheduling and regulation of controlled dangerous substances in Louisiana. The bill amends existing laws to include certain substances in Schedule IV while also modifying the classifications in Schedule III. Notable additions include the substance suvorexant, which is classified under Schedule IV, reflecting an effort to regulate drugs that are not only commonly abused but also play a significant role in treatment paradigms.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 174 leans towards support, particularly from health advocacy groups concerned about opioid misuse and the need for a robust regulatory framework for these substances. Legislators engaged in the discussions highlighted the importance of balancing prescription practices with public health considerations, underscoring a collective recognition of the opioid crisis as a pressing issue.

Contention

While the majority supported the bill, there are concerns raised by some members regarding the impact on patient care. Critics suggest that overly stringent regulations might hinder access to necessary medications for patients suffering from chronic pain. The tension between ensuring public safety and providing adequate treatment options remains a point of contention, as stakeholders navigate the implications of the bill in practice.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.