Louisiana 2015 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB195

Introduced
3/30/15  
Refer
3/30/15  
Refer
4/13/15  
Refer
4/13/15  
Report Pass
5/4/15  
Engrossed
5/12/15  
Refer
5/13/15  
Refer
5/13/15  
Report Pass
5/26/15  
Report Pass
5/26/15  
Enrolled
6/7/15  
Enrolled
6/7/15  
Chaptered
6/29/15  
Chaptered
6/29/15  
Passed
6/29/15  

Caption

Provides with respect to the office of coroner (EN NO IMPACT See Note)

Impact

By redefining the medical pronouncement of death, HB 195 seeks to streamline the process and potentially reduce discrepancies that may arise from varying local practices. The bill clarifies that the time of death should correlate with the time of reporting or discovery, thereby standardizing how death notifications are recorded. Furthermore, it introduces provisions for the appointment of deputy and assistant coroners, facilitating a more flexible approach to fulfilling coroner duties within the parish, ensuring that qualified individuals can serve regardless of their residency status.

Summary

House Bill 195 amends and reenacts several statutes related to the office of coroner in Louisiana. The bill's primary focus is on clarifying the processes that coroners must follow when pronouncing death, specifically the types of information that can be used for such determinations. It allows coroners to rely on firsthand observations by various medical personnel, including registered nurses and emergency medical technicians, ensuring a broader scope of input when assessing the time and cause of death.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 195 appears largely supportive among legislative members, as indicated by its unanimous passage through the house votes. The bill's proponents highlight its practical approach to adapting coroner operations to modern needs and improving efficiency in death investigations. Overall, the discussions reflected a consensus on the necessity of ensuring that the administration of coroner responsibilities aligns with best practices and available resources.

Contention

While there was general agreement on supporting the bill, some concerns were raised regarding the potential implications of allowing non-resident coroners to serve. Critics feared that this might compromise local accountability and the ability to address community-specific issues surrounding death investigations. However, such concerns did not significantly hinder the bill's progress, as stakeholders recognized the importance of maintaining a qualified staff to handle these sensitive duties effectively.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.