Louisiana 2015 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB320

Introduced
4/1/15  
Refer
4/1/15  
Refer
4/13/15  
Refer
4/13/15  
Report Pass
5/12/15  
Report Pass
5/12/15  
Engrossed
5/20/15  
Engrossed
5/20/15  
Refer
5/21/15  
Refer
5/21/15  
Report Pass
6/1/15  
Report Pass
6/1/15  
Enrolled
6/9/15  
Enrolled
6/9/15  
Chaptered
7/1/15  
Passed
7/1/15  

Caption

Provides relative to dropout prevention and recovery

Impact

The bill is expected to enhance the state's efforts in addressing high school dropout rates by mandating school districts to implement recovery programs. These programs will not only serve as a safety net for students who leave school prematurely but will also ensure that they have a structured path toward graduation. By requiring monthly reporting of student participation in these programs, HB 320 aims to create accountability and track the effectiveness of these initiatives in reducing dropout rates and encouraging completion of education.

Summary

House Bill 320 aims to amend and reenact several provisions related to dropout prevention and recovery programs in Louisiana. The bill specifically targets students under the age of eighteen who withdraw from school before graduating and are not enrolled in a recovery program. It establishes criteria that school districts and charter schools must follow to offer dropout recovery programs, emphasizing the utilization of available federal funds to support these initiatives. By formalizing the dropout recovery framework, the state seeks to improve educational outcomes for at-risk students.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around HB 320 appears to be positive, with legislators acknowledging the importance of keeping students engaged in their education. Stakeholders, including educators and community leaders, have expressed support for enhancing dropout recovery efforts. However, there are concerns about funding adequacy and the actual implementation of the programs in schools, which could lead to variations in effectiveness across districts.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the challenge of ensuring that all school districts have the resources and capacity to establish effective dropout recovery programs. Critics may argue that without sufficient funding and support from the state, the bill's objectives could falter. Moreover, there is the issue of defining eligibility criteria for students and how rigorously participation is monitored, which could lead to disparities in how different regions implement the programs.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.