Louisiana 2015 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB514

Introduced
4/3/15  
Refer
4/3/15  
Refer
4/3/15  
Refer
4/13/15  
Report Pass
4/28/15  
Report Pass
4/28/15  
Engrossed
5/14/15  
Engrossed
5/14/15  
Refer
5/18/15  

Caption

Provides for notice to certain state departments and agencies of suits involving violation of certain permits

Impact

The legislation specifically modifies the Code of Civil Procedure by adding Article 1204, which dictates that parties must notify the appropriate state department of any claims alleging permit violations within a specified timeframe. The requirement for notifying these agencies aims to ensure they are kept informed of potential legal issues that could affect their regulatory responsibilities. If passed, this law would streamline the communication process related to lawsuits concerning permit violations, potentially expediting legal proceedings and resolutions.

Summary

House Bill 514, introduced by Representative Schexnayder, establishes procedures for notifying relevant state departments and agencies when there are allegations of violations of state-issued permits. The bill aims to ensure that if a legal proceeding involves such allegations, the concerned state entity, or the Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority if applicable, is appropriately informed. This enhances transparency and accountability concerning regulatory compliance issues, particularly in coastal areas, which are critical for environmental and economic interests.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 514 appears to be largely positive among those concerned with regulatory oversight and environmental protection. Supporters argue that the bill provides a necessary framework for communication between litigants and state agencies, potentially preventing environmental harm resulting from permit violations. However, there may be apprehension among parties involved in litigation, as the additional notification requirement could increase legal burdens or complicate settlements.

Contention

Notably, there is potential contention regarding the implication of these notification requirements on pending or settled claims. The bill states that it does not apply to judicial demands resolved prior to its effective date, which raises questions about retroactive applicability and the burden this might impose on litigants. This aspect may become a point of debate, particularly as it could influence ongoing cases surrounding state-issued permits.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1200

Enforcement of judgments: renewal and interest.

AZ HB2297

Judgments; liens; homestead exemption

KY HB801

AN ACT relating to Canadian money judgments.

CA AB1119

Enforcement of judgments.

CA AB905

Money judgments of other jurisdictions.

CA SB642

Civil actions: renewal of judgments.

VA HB1234

Judgments; limitations on enforcement, extensions and renewals.

CA SB355

Judgment debtor employers: Employment Development Department.