Louisiana House Bill HCR135

Louisiana 2015 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/11/15
• Engrossed: 5/11/15
• Refer: 5/12/15

Caption

Requests the Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority to establish a subcommittee to study at-risk energy infrastructure in the coastal area

Impact

By urging the CPRA to develop actionable recommendations, HCR135 intends to create stringent guidelines that would secure energy infrastructure against environmental threats, such as erosion and extreme weather conditions. The adoption of innovative and collaborative restoration technologies and practices is encouraged, potentially leading to increased collaboration between the energy sector and ecological stakeholders. HCR135 suggests that through shared investments and focused restoration projects, stakeholders can better preserve these crucial energy channels while promoting ecological recovery in affected areas.

Summary

HCR135 is a House Concurrent Resolution that emphasizes the need for a structured response to the critical state of coastal infrastructure in Louisiana, particularly concerning energy pipelines that have become vulnerable due to significant coastal land loss. The resolution calls upon the Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority (CPRA) to form a subcommittee tasked with devising a coastal protection and restoration program aimed at safeguarding at-risk energy infrastructure. This initiative is positioned as a dual approach to bolster energy asset security while also yielding broader ecological benefits.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HCR135 tends to be positive as it underscores the state's proactive measures toward a growing issue of environmental degradation impacting vital energy resources. Advocates view this resolution as a necessary step in prioritizing both immediate operational needs of energy providers and the long-term sustainability of the surrounding ecosystems. However, some concerns may arise regarding the feasibility of suggested programs and the allocation of resources, with opponents questioning if enough has been done to ensure that both energy and ecological needs are met equitably.

Contention

Though supported by many for its intent, there may be contention over how effectively the proposed subcommittee will operate and the scope of its recommendations. Critics may argue that merely having a subcommittee is insufficient compared to implementing direct regulations and policies necessary to protect endangered pipelines. The potential challenge lies in balancing immediate energy industry demands with broader ecological considerations, and whether the plan will yield tangible results for both sectors.