Louisiana House Bill HR177

Louisiana 2015 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/8/15
• Passed: 6/10/15

Caption

Urges and requests the division of administration and the Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority to study the feasibility of using alternative delivery methods for large scale coastal restoration projects

Impact

The passage of HR 177, while not a law itself but rather a resolution, underscores the importance of adopting effective project management strategies to address the state's immediate environmental concerns. It indicates a legislative interest in prioritizing coastal restoration efforts and emphasizes the need for efficient use of resources in public infrastructure projects. Should the state administration heed this resolution, it could lead to more timely and effective responses to coastal threats, impacting local laws and procedures governing construction and environmental protection.

Summary

House Resolution 177, introduced by Representative Stuart Bishop, urges the division of administration and the Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority of Louisiana to fully explore the construction manager at risk (CMAR) project delivery and procurement process. The resolution highlights the urgency for Louisiana to initiate multiple large-scale coastal restoration projects that have been identified as necessary to combat the pressing threats of coastal erosion in the region. By leveraging the CMAR process, the resolution aims to expedite project commencement and delivery, as well as enhance the efficiency of utilizing the construction industry’s capabilities in these efforts.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HR 177 appears to be favorable, particularly among legislators concerned with environmental issues and coastal protection. The resolution has garnered significant bipartisan support, evidenced by the unanimous vote in favor. This collective backing reflects a consensus on the importance of taking proactive measures regarding Louisiana’s coastal vulnerabilities. The use of CMAR is seen as a promising approach to enhance project delivery efficiency and effectiveness.

Contention

While there may not be significant public opposition to HR 177 as reflected in the voting history, broader discussions about coastal restoration often highlight tensions regarding funding and prioritization. Notably, concerns arise about the potential over-reliance on specific procurement methods and whether they truly address the intricate challenges of natural resource preservation against budget constraints and political influences. The resolution’s alignment with the CMAR method could prompt debates about its effectiveness compared to alternative methods within the context of complex restoration projects.