Applies to congress under U.S. Const. Art. V to call a convention of the states to propose U.S. constitutional amendments to impose fiscal restraints on the federal government, limit federal government power, and provide for term limits for federal officials and members of congress
If passed, HCR2 could pave the way for significant changes to the U.S. Constitution concerning federal authority and accountability. The proposed amendments aim to curb federal overreach, echoing widespread sentiments among certain constituencies advocating for more state autonomy and less federal intervention. This could potentially alter the balance of power between state and federal governments, affecting various aspects of governance and public policy.
HCR2 is a concurrent resolution from the Louisiana Legislature applying to the U.S. Congress for a call to convention under Article V of the U.S. Constitution. The purpose of this resolution is to propose amendments that impose fiscal restraints on the federal government, limit its power and jurisdiction, and establish term limits for federal officials and members of Congress. The resolution underscores a proactive approach taken by state lawmakers, indicating a perceived need for reform at the federal level.
The general sentiment surrounding HCR2 is mixed, primarily reflecting a divide between those who advocate for limited government and increased states' rights versus those who caution against the implications of a constitutional convention. Supporters argue that such measures are essential for restoring fiscal sanity and accountability in Washington, while critics express concerns about the risks associated with opening the Constitution to amendments, fearing unintended changes that could undermine essential rights or safeguards.
Notable points of contention regarding HCR2 include the apprehensions voiced by opponents about the potential consequences of a state convention which could lead to amendments that might alter fundamental rights or protections. Furthermore, there are calls from various groups for a careful analysis of the intended and unintended consequences of such amendments. Discussions highlight a fundamental debate within the state and across the nation regarding the appropriate scope and limitations of federal power.