Louisiana 2015 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HR149

Introduced
6/3/15  
Introduced
6/3/15  
Passed
6/7/15  

Caption

Urges the Department of Insurance to study the appeals process and its impact on those with critical illnesses

Impact

The study requested by HR149 seeks to evaluate how many adverse decisions regarding medications are made annually in Louisiana, the volume of appeals filed against these decisions, and the overall effectiveness of the appeals system. By understanding these metrics, the Department of Insurance could potentially influence legislative changes aimed at improving the appeals process, safeguarding patients' access to vital medications, and ensuring their well-being during critical periods of treatment.

Summary

House Resolution 149 urges the Louisiana Department of Insurance to conduct a study on the appeals process for individuals denied medical benefits by health insurers, particularly those with critical illnesses. The resolution highlights concerns over 'adverse determinations,' where insurers declare medications as not medically necessary, which can severely affect the health of patients suffering from conditions such as multiple sclerosis, cancer, and heart disease. The bill aims to ensure that the voices of patients are heard and considered during such determinations.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around HR149 appears to be largely supportive, particularly among health advocacy groups and patient rights organizations. These stakeholders view the resolution as a necessary step towards increased accountability in the insurance industry and improved health outcomes for vulnerable populations. However, as discussions progress, there might be concerns regarding the potential implications for insurers and their operational policies, adding a layer of complexity to the dialogue around health insurance reforms.

Contention

Potential points of contention may emerge from insurers who might argue that the appeals process, as it currently stands, is effective and that further studies may result in increased regulatory burdens. Additionally, there could be debates over the definition of 'medically necessary' and how these determinations are made. Moreover, ensuring that physicians are adequately consulted in the appeals process is another aspect that requires careful consideration, as it directly impacts patient care and treatment continuity.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

LA HCR247

Urges and requests the Department of Insurance to study the practice of credit scoring

LA HR337

Requests the Department of Insurance to study and issue a report relative to the impact of health insurance coverage mandates on the cost of health insurance

LA HCR132

Urges and requests the Department of Insurance to study the issuance of private letter rulings by the commissioner of insurance

LA HCR222

Requests the Department of Insurance to study the need to regulate insurance consultants

LA SCR64

Requests the Department of Insurance to study and make recommendations with respect to the health insurance crisis.

LA HCR46

Urges and requests the Dept. of Insurance to study the practice of credit scoring

LA HR107

Urges and requests the Department of Health and Hospitals to study Medicaid reimbursement and recoupment processes with respect to payments to nonemergency medical transportation providers

LA HCR96

Requests the Department of Insurance to study the impact of alternative funding programs on patient access to affordable prescription drugs

LA HB645

Provides relative to an internal claims and appeals process and external review procedures for health insurance issuers (EN INCREASE SG RV See Note)

LA HR152

Urges and requests the secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services to study the negative health impacts of imported shrimp

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.