Louisiana 2015 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB42

Introduced
3/24/15  
Introduced
3/24/15  
Refer
3/24/15  
Refer
3/24/15  
Refer
4/13/15  
Report Pass
5/11/15  
Report Pass
5/11/15  
Engrossed
5/13/15  
Engrossed
5/13/15  
Refer
5/14/15  
Refer
5/14/15  
Report Pass
5/26/15  
Enrolled
6/8/15  
Chaptered
6/29/15  
Chaptered
6/29/15  

Caption

Provides for the procedure for notification for certain contracts. (gov sig) (EN DECREASE GF EX See Note)

Impact

The enactment of SB42 is intended to strengthen the competitive bidding environment by ensuring that all prospective bidders are adequately notified of forthcoming contract opportunities. By requiring a specific notification period, the bill seeks to foster fair competition, which may help achieve better pricing and service delivery for the state. The changes introduced by this bill are also expected to align Louisiana's contracting procedures with best practices observed in other states, thereby promoting efficiency in public procurement.

Summary

Senate Bill 42 amends Louisiana's statute regarding the procedures for competitive proposals, particularly focusing on the notification process for certain contracts. The bill mandates that public notice for requests for proposals be published at least 30 days prior to the deadline for submissions. This aims to improve transparency and enhance the competitive bidding process for government contracts, ensuring that a wider range of participants have the opportunity to respond to contract opportunities.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB42 appears to be largely supportive, particularly among those advocating for transparency and fairness in government contracting. Proponents argue that the extended notification period will enable more vendors, especially smaller businesses, to participate in the bidding process. This is seen as beneficial for economic development and local business growth. However, there may be concerns from within government agencies regarding the potential delays in contract execution due to the extended notification requirements.

Contention

While the bill has been received positively overall, discussion may arise concerning the practicality of the new requirements. Critics might argue that the additional notification time could hinder swift decision-making in urgent procurement situations. Balancing the need for a fair contracting process with the necessity for timely government action remains a focal point in debates surrounding the bill.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.