Louisiana 2016 1st Special Session

Louisiana House Bill HB11

Introduced
2/12/16  
Refer
2/12/16  
Refer
2/14/16  

Caption

Reduces the amount of the discount for accurately reporting and timely remitting state excise taxes on alcoholic beverages and beer (Item #23) (OR +$750,000 GF RV See Note)

Impact

The reduction of tax discounts for reporting and remitting excise taxes is likely to affect both consumers and businesses within the alcoholic beverage industry. By decreasing the discounts, the state aims to bolster revenue from excise taxes, potentially impacting pricing strategies for affected beverages. Supporters of the bill may argue that it can contribute to a more balanced state budget by increasing tax collections, while opponents may be concerned about the potential burden on businesses that depend on these tax benefits to manage their operational costs.

Summary

House Bill 11 proposes to amend and reduce the discounts available to taxpayers for the accurate reporting and timely remittance of state excise taxes on alcoholic beverages. Currently, there is a 2% discount for low alcoholic content beverages and a 3.33% discount for high alcoholic content beverages. The bill seeks to modify these percentages to 1% and 1.67% respectively, thus decreasing the financial incentive for taxpayers under the existing tax framework. The bill's adjustment is expected to have significant implications for revenue generation by the state, aligning with fiscal goals within Louisiana's budget planning.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 11 appears to be mixed, with proponents claiming it as a necessary financial adjustment in light of the state's economic needs. They emphasize ensuring adequate funding for state programs by optimizing revenue flows from excise taxes. Conversely, opposition voices may critique the bill as an unfavorable shift that places a heavier financial load on local businesses, potentially leading to increases in consumer prices for alcoholic beverages, thus impacting overall sales and consumption.

Contention

Notable points of contention revolve around the implications of reducing tax discounts for local entities. Critics suggest that the bill may unfairly disadvantage smaller businesses that rely heavily on the existing tax structure to remain competitive. There is concern that these adjustments could dissuade responsible business practices regarding tax reporting, thus raising compliance risks with the state's tax regime. Overall, the conversation around HB 11 reflects broader debates on taxation and economic responsibility in the context of local versus state-level interests.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

TX SB1142

Relating to regulation of discount drug card program operators; authorizing administrative and civil penalties; authorizing fees; expanding a registration requirement.

TX HB3028

Relating to regulation of certain conduct by discount health care program operators, or concerning discount health care programs, that relates to prescription drugs or prescription drug benefits; authorizing administrative and civil penalties.

CA AB2128

State parks: California Admission Day: discounted admission.

TX SB2339

Relating to the regulation of discount health care programs by the Texas Department of Insurance; providing penalties.

KS SB289

Requiring economic development electric rate discounts offered by public utilities to cover the incremental and variable costs to serve customers that receive such a discount.

CA AB1312

Hospital pricing.

CA AB1722

Alcoholic beverage licensees: restrictions: coupons.

KS SB81

Prohibiting large facilities receiving certain tariffs or failing to meet workforce and electric demand requirements from qualifying for economic development electric rates.