Louisiana 2016 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB661

Introduced
3/4/16  
Introduced
3/4/16  
Refer
3/4/16  
Refer
3/4/16  
Refer
3/14/16  
Refer
3/14/16  
Report Pass
3/31/16  

Caption

Provides with respect to the illegal employment of aliens unauthorized to work in the United States (OR INCREASE SD RV See Note)

Impact

The ramifications of HB 661 are substantial as it seeks to enforce stricter compliance measures within the state regarding the employment of unauthorized aliens. The bill not only heightens financial penalties but also makes it progressively easier for authorities to suspend or revoke business licenses for non-compliance. This shift represents an effort to deter the unlawful hiring of undocumented workers, aligning state policy with stricter federal immigration enforcement, and thereby aims to reshape the labor market landscape in Louisiana by compelling employers to enforce verification checks more rigorously.

Summary

House Bill 661 aims to intensify the penalties imposed on employers who unlawfully employ aliens not authorized to work in the United States. The bill increases both criminal and civil penalties for violations, with significant escalations for repeated offenses. Under the proposed law, the fine for a first offense would surge from a maximum of $500 to a maximum of $25,000 per illegal alien employed, coupled with a one-year suspension of the employer's business license. For second offenses, the fine would rise to $50,000 per illegal alien and a five-year suspension of the license, while the penalties for third or subsequent violations could reach a staggering $75,000 per illegal alien, culminating in permanent revocation of the employer’s license to operate.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 661 appears to be predominantly supportive among lawmakers who view tougher penalties as necessary to counteract illegal employment practices. Advocates argue that the bill reinforces the rule of law and protects American jobs. Conversely, there is notable pushback from labor advocacy groups and some community representatives who express concerns that elevated penalties may disproportionately affect small businesses and lead to increased exploitation of vulnerable workers. This divergence reflects broader national debates over immigration policy and labor rights.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the appropriateness of the penalties imposed, with opponents asserting that the bill may create fear among employers regarding legal repercussions, potentially discouraging job creation. Additionally, there are concerns about the enforcement practicality of such stringent regulations, as critics argue it risks pushing illegal employment further underground, rather than effectively resolving the issue. The bill also raises questions over its impact on industries that heavily rely on temporary or migrant labor, particularly agriculture and hospitality.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

NJ A4283

Provides personal liability for owner, executive officer, or executive director of employer for failure to pay for workers' compensation coverage.

KY HB554

AN ACT relating to short-time compensation.

MS HB605

PERS; contribution rates not increased unless authorized by Legislature, and make recommendation on changes to the plan.

MS SB3231

PERS; revise employer contribution rate increase, and redefine responsibilities of board and Legislature.

MS SB2903

MS Deferred Comp; allow Roth and other after-tax accounts, and comply with qualified domestic relations orders.

AZ SB1361

Employers; compensation history; prohibitions

MI HB4295

Labor: fair employment practices; requirements to obtain a fair paycheck workplace certificate; provide for. Creates new act.

AZ SB1085

PSPRS; funded ratio; asset transfers