Louisiana House Bill HB738

Louisiana 2016 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/4/16
• Refer: 3/4/16
• Refer: 3/14/16
• Report Pass: 3/29/16
• Engrossed: 4/14/16
• Refer: 4/18/16
• Report Pass: 5/23/16

Caption

Provides relative to the enforcement and supervision of the collection of certain inspection and supervision fees (EGF NO IMPACT SD RV See Note)

Impact

The enactment of HB 738 is expected to standardize the enforcement mechanisms employed by the Department of Revenue in overseeing the collection of these fees. This clarification might lead to improved compliance among motor carriers and public utilities, as it streamlines the existing legal landscape following the repeal of railroad-related fees. The bill aims to ensure that the remaining sectors are effectively regulated, providing a clearer guideline for revenue collection procedures in Louisiana.

Summary

House Bill 738, introduced by Representative Abramson, concerns the enforcement and supervision of collection for specific inspection and supervision fees related to motor carriers and public utilities. The bill specifically amends existing law to reflect the removal of regulations concerning railroads, which were previously repealed in 2007. This change is essential for clarifying the current legal framework governing the collection of these fees, ensuring that the Department of Revenue maintains its supervisory role over the fees applicable to remaining sectors under its jurisdiction.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 738 appears largely supportive among legislators who view it as a necessary administrative update to current laws. By addressing the outdated references to railroads, the bill positions itself as a proactive measure to improve enforcement of revenue collection. However, some apprehension may exist regarding how the changes will affect entities that fall under the categories of motor carriers and public utilities, with calls for careful implementation to prevent any potential confusion or disruption in current practices.

Contention

One notable point of contention is the potential for increased scrutiny and oversight of motor carriers and public utilities due to the reinstatement of enforcement provisions. While supporters argue this is essential for maintaining an equitable revenue collection system, critics may raise concerns about the implications for businesses that could face higher compliance burdens. The discussions around the bill reflect a balance between ensuring adequate revenue for state needs and alleviating pressure on businesses reliant on these services.