Provides relative to student discipline including the creation of the Commission on Safe Supportive Discipline (OR INCREASE LF EX See Note)
The bill mandates that local educational agencies create plans aimed at meeting or exceeding national average suspension rates within a two-year timeframe. These plans must document specific measures they will take to support students and improve behavioral outcomes. Schools not meeting the required suspension thresholds after the initial implementation period must continue their efforts with added requirements, such as hiring independent consultants to assist in plan execution. This initiative is expected to modify existing disciplinary practices, promoting evidence-based alternatives like Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports to reduce reliance on suspensions for minor infractions.
House Bill 833, introduced by Representative Leger, focuses on reforming student discipline policies in Louisiana public schools, specifically aiming to reduce out-of-school suspensions. The bill proactively addresses issues related to the disproportionate impact of suspension rates on certain demographic groups, particularly African-American male students and students with disabilities. It establishes the Commission on Safe Supportive Discipline under the Louisiana Department of Education to oversee the implementation of the bill's provisions. The commission will be responsible for helping local educational agencies design plans to reduce suspension rates, set benchmarks for success, and facilitate the sharing of best practices across schools.
The sentiment surrounding HB 833 is generally supportive among educators and advocates for equity in education, as it seeks to address a long-standing concern of excessive and biased disciplinary measures. Supporters argue that reducing out-of-school suspensions will not only improve student outcomes but will also foster a more inclusive school environment. However, there are concerns about the practical implementation of the proposed measures and the ability of schools to adapt to the changes required. Critics may express skepticism regarding the effectiveness of such reforms in truly altering the disciplinary landscape without adequate resources and training.
Despite the intended benefits, there are potential points of contention. Lawmakers and stakeholders may debate the sufficiency of the state's approach to educational disparities, questioning whether merely reducing suspension rates will adequately address the root causes of student misbehavior and school discipline culture. Additionally, there may be discussions about the accountability measures needed to ensure compliance with the new requirements and whether schools will receive the necessary support to implement the recommended changes effectively. These discussions highlight the broader conversation about balancing discipline with educational equity in Louisiana's school system.