Louisiana House Bill HCR145

Louisiana 2016 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/31/16
• Engrossed: 5/31/16
• Passed: 6/3/16

Caption

Designates Tuesday, May 31, 2016, as abstinence day in the state of Louisiana

Impact

The passage of HCR145 does not alter state laws but serves as a symbolic declaration intended to encourage Louisiana citizens to reflect on their sexual practices and moral responsibilities. By proclaiming a specific day for the observance of abstinence, the resolution aims to raise awareness about the perceived moral shortcomings of contemporary society and to promote virtues that contribute to community cohesion. In essence, this resolution calls for a societal shift towards ethical responsibility regarding sexual behavior, without imposing legal consequences.

Summary

HCR145, a House Concurrent Resolution introduced by Representative Stokes, designates Tuesday, May 31, 2016, as Abstinence Day in the state of Louisiana. The resolution promotes the notion of abstinence as a means of instilling virtue among citizens, arguing that moral virtues are crucial for the social well-being of the community. It suggests that a decline in virtuous behavior leads to societal issues, including unwanted pregnancies and abortions, and underscores the importance of self-discipline and social obligations over self-interest.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding this resolution leans toward a conservative viewpoint that values traditional moral principles. Supporters may view HCR145 as a step toward rebuilding societal values and addressing the consequences of perceived moral decline. However, the initiative could be seen as contentious among others who feel that personal choice regarding sexual practices should remain an individual matter, thereby opening up debates about morality, personal freedoms, and the role of government in dictating social behavior.

Contention

Notable points of contention arise from the conceptual framework of HCR145. Critics may argue that such resolutions attempt to legislate morality rather than allowing individuals to make personal decisions based on their circumstances. The resolution implicitly critiques modern societal values, suggesting that personal indulgence undermines community ties. This ideological stance can polarize opinions, leading to debates on whether abstinence and chastity should be promoted through government-sanctioned observances, thus raising questions about the separation of personal beliefs and state endorsements.