Provides relative to Charitable Gaming. (8/1/16)
The enactment of SB188 modifies existing state laws to allow for new forms of charitable gaming. Specifically, it permits charitable organizations to link or network together to conduct progressive mega jackpot bingo games, enhancing the potential prize amounts and engagement in such activities. Additionally, contributions made towards progressive jackpots are distinct from the total prize pool calculations, which allows for larger potential jackpots while not impacting the overall prize regulation framework. This change is expected to increase funding opportunities for charitable causes as more players may be drawn to the enticing prospect of larger jackpots.
Senate Bill 188 addresses the realm of charitable gaming in Louisiana, specifically focusing on the regulations surrounding bingo, raffles, and keno. This bill enables certain licensed charitable organizations to conduct progressive bingo games and introduces the use of Electronic Bingo Card Dabber Devices (EBCDD). The legislation seeks to facilitate greater participation in charitable gaming by streamlining licensing requirements and providing exemptions under specific circumstances, such as fundraising for local schools or community support initiatives.
The sentiment around SB188 appears to be generally supportive among supporters of charitable organizations and local schools, who see it as an opportunity to bolster fundraising efforts. There is an appreciation for the reduced regulatory burden on smaller charities, allowing them to engage more customers and raise funds effectively. However, some voices in the community may raise concerns about gambling issues and the potential for increased prevalence of gaming machines, emphasizing the need for careful regulation to prevent negative societal impacts.
Notable points of contention surrounding SB188 include the distinctions made between EBCDD and actual electronic video bingo machines, with provisions in the bill explicitly preventing EBCDD from being considered as gaming machines that accept money or tokens for play. While proponents argue that this keeps the essence of charitable gaming intact, some worry that the increasing use of technology in gaming could blur the lines and lead to a regulatory challenge. Additionally, the implications of allowing larger jackpots and networking between organizations can raise debates about maintaining the integrity of charitable gaming activities versus the commercialization of such events.