Louisiana Senate Bill SR180

Louisiana 2016 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/2/16
• Passed: 6/3/16

Caption

Requests the State Board of Elementary and Secondary Education to conduct a fiscal impact study prior to making a determination relative to a Type 2 charter school proposal.

Impact

The passage of SR180 is expected to reinforce the role of local school boards in the charter approval process. By requiring a fiscal impact analysis, the resolution aims to prevent potential negative consequences on local education systems that could arise from the establishment of additional charter schools. Local boards would benefit from having a clearer picture of how proposed charters may affect their financial and educational landscape, thereby enhancing their ability to advocate for the best interests of their constituents.

Summary

Senate Resolution No. 180 urges the State Board of Elementary and Secondary Education to conduct a fiscal impact study for proposed Type 2 charter schools before granting approval. The resolution highlights the importance of understanding how such schools draw resources and students from local school districts, a critical aspect that directly affects the funding and educational quality provided by these districts. This move is designed to increase transparency and ensure that local boards can make informed decisions about charter school proposals.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SR180 appears largely positive among local school board members and educators who see the resolution as a necessary step toward safeguarding educational funding and maintaining quality in public schools. The demand for a fiscal impact study resonates with concerns about the sustainability of local districts amidst increasing competition from charter schools. However, there may be some contention among proponents of charter schools who might view this requirement as an obstacle to the establishment of new educational options for families.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise from the timing and thoroughness of the fiscal impact studies, as well as the processes that the State Board of Elementary and Secondary Education will use to evaluate charter proposals. Some may argue that the requirement for a comprehensive fiscal analysis could delay the approval of new charter schools, thereby reducing options for families seeking alternative educational paths. The discussion also touches upon broader themes of educational equity and resource allocation in the context of public versus charter schools.