Louisiana 2018 1st Special Session

Louisiana House Bill HCR2

Introduced
2/16/18  
Introduced
2/16/18  
Refer
2/16/18  
Refer
2/16/18  
Refer
2/19/18  
Refer
2/19/18  
Report Pass
2/20/18  
Report Pass
2/20/18  
Engrossed
2/28/18  
Engrossed
2/28/18  
Refer
3/2/18  

Caption

Reduces the expenditure limit for FY 2018-2019 (Item #12) (EG SEE FISC NOTE GF EX See Note)

Impact

If passed, HCR2 will not only impact the fiscal policies for the 2018-2019 financial year but also set a precedent for managing future expenditures under Louisiana's constitution. The resolution stipulates that any funding exceeding the established limit should be channeled into the Budget Stabilization Fund, aiming to ensure that the state maintains adequate reserves. This shift may affect various state-funded programs and services for the year in question.

Summary

House Concurrent Resolution No. 2 (HCR2) seeks to direct the commissioner of administration to lower the expenditure limit for the Fiscal Year 2018-2019 from approximately $14.8 billion to around $13.6 billion. This proposed change is grounded in Article VII, Section 10(C) of the Louisiana Constitution, which allows for adjustments to spending caps by a two-thirds vote from each legislative house. Supporters argue that this reduction aligns with fiscal responsibility and maintains budgetary discipline.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HCR2 appears to be mixed, reflecting the broader divided opinions on budget management in Louisiana. Proponents highlight the necessity of fiscal restraint and argue that a controlled budget is essential for the state's economic health. Conversely, some legislators, particularly from the opposing party, raise concerns about potential negative ramifications on public services and programs due to tightened spending.

Contention

Notable points of contention arise from the implications of reduced funding on essential services. Critics of HCR2 point out that while fiscal discipline is essential, the reduction in the expenditure limit might constrain state resources available for healthcare, education, and infrastructure needs. The debate reflects a deeper ideological divide over prioritizing fiscal responsibility versus ensuring adequate funding for public services, a hallmark of ongoing legislative discourse within the state.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB321

Late signature curing expenditure reports.

CA AB2447

California State University: fiscal transparency: internet website.

AZ HB2364

Lobbyists; gift ban exemption

AZ HB2089

Community colleges; expenditure limitation

CA AB1052

The Financial Information System for California (FISCal).

CA AB62

State government: FI$Cal: transparency.

CA SB468

Taxation: tax expenditures: California Tax Expenditure Review Board.

ND SB2318

Reporting of aggregate expenditures for political purposes; and to provide a penalty.