Louisiana 2018 2nd Special Session

Louisiana House Bill HB34

Introduced
5/29/18  
Introduced
5/29/18  
Refer
5/29/18  
Refer
5/29/18  
Report Pass
5/30/18  
Report Pass
5/30/18  
Engrossed
5/31/18  
Report Pass
6/2/18  
Report Pass
6/2/18  
Enrolled
6/4/18  
Chaptered
6/12/18  
Chaptered
6/12/18  
Passed
6/12/18  

Caption

Makes supplemental appropriations for Fiscal Year 2018-2019 for the expenses of the judiciary (Item #3)

Impact

The impact of HB 34 on state laws is primarily related to the financial structuring of the judicial system. By allocating additional funds to the judiciary, the bill seeks to address any budgetary shortfalls and ensure that all courts have the necessary resources to operate. This is particularly crucial in maintaining the efficacy of the legal system and contributing to public confidence in the judiciary's ability to administer justice. Given that the funding is tied to revenue measures, the ability to enact these appropriations is contingent upon the state's overall financial health.

Summary

House Bill 34 is designed to make supplemental appropriations for the Fiscal Year 2018-2019 specifically to cover the expenses of the Louisiana Judiciary. This bill includes provisions to allocate funds necessary for the operations of various courts, including the Supreme Court and Courts of Appeal, among others. The bill reflects an important legislative action aimed at ensuring that the judiciary has adequate financial resources to function effectively in carrying out its judicial responsibilities.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 34 was largely supportive among legislators, as it is common to ensure that the judiciary is adequately funded. The unanimous vote of 102-0 in favor of the bill indicates that there was a strong consensus among those in the legislature regarding the necessity of the funding. Recognizing the importance of judiciary funding is generally seen as a non-partisan issue, with an alignment across party lines on ensuring that the courts can operate without financial impediments.

Contention

While there may not have been significant contention regarding the bill itself given its unanimous support, the discussions surrounding appropriations can often evoke debates on prioritization of state resources. Concerns may arise in broader discussions about budget allocations, especially in the context of other competing fiscal needs within the state. However, in the specific case of HB 34, it focused on addressing judicial funding, leading to a cooperative legislative environment aimed at supporting state functions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.