Louisiana House Bill HB302

Louisiana 2018 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/1/18
• Refer: 3/1/18
• Refer: 3/12/18
• Report Pass: 3/19/18
• Engrossed: 3/27/18
• Refer: 3/28/18
• Report Pass: 4/18/18
• Enrolled: 4/26/18
• Chaptered: 5/10/18
• Passed: 5/10/18

Caption

Re-creates the Department of Public Service

Impact

The enactment of HB 302 will effectively continue the authority of the Department of Public Service and its affiliates, preventing operational disruption that would have arisen from the termination of these entities. With the re-creation stipulated in the bill, the department remains empowered to oversee various public service functions efficiently, ensuring that legislative oversight is maintained. This stability is likely to benefit stakeholders and the public who rely on the services provided by these entities.

Summary

House Bill 302 aims to re-create the Department of Public Service and its associated statutory entities in Louisiana, which had faced potential termination of legislative authority. The bill sets forth provisions to ensure that the department and its entities can continue functioning beyond the previously established termination date of July 1, 2023. This re-creation signifies a commitment by the state to maintain a structured governance framework overseeing public services, which include oversight and regulatory functions critical to the state's operations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 302 appears largely supportive, reflected in the unanimous Senate vote in favor of the bill. There seems to be a consensus among legislators on the importance of preserving the department’s structure and functions, indicating an understanding of the critical role these public service entities play in the broader governance context of the state. The unanimous nature of the vote suggests that there were no significant points of contention among lawmakers regarding the bill’s intentions.

Contention

While HB 302 appears to have met with favorable reception, the underlying issues concerning state governance and the ongoing debate over governmental structures remain relevant. The bill’s proactive approach to prevent the termination of the Department of Public Service signals an awareness of the importance of governmental continuity. However, potential concerns could arise in future discussions regarding how these entities are managed and the effectiveness of their operations, particularly in addressing changing public needs and regulatory issues.