Louisiana 2018 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB126

Introduced
2/27/18  
Introduced
2/27/18  
Refer
2/27/18  
Refer
2/27/18  
Refer
3/12/18  
Refer
3/12/18  
Report Pass
3/14/18  
Report Pass
3/14/18  
Engrossed
3/21/18  
Engrossed
3/21/18  
Refer
3/22/18  
Report Pass
4/10/18  
Report Pass
4/10/18  
Enrolled
5/2/18  
Chaptered
5/11/18  
Passed
5/11/18  

Caption

Provides relative to recall repairs of motor vehicles. (8/1/18)

Impact

The passage of SB 126 directly impacts motor vehicle regulation in Louisiana by establishing new obligations for manufacturers regarding their compensation to dealers. Under the new law, manufacturers are prohibited from reducing compensation due to a dealer's recall reimbursement claims. This legislative change is expected to give dealers greater financial security when handling recalls, promoting accountability among manufacturers to maintain an effective supply chain for parts and repairs.

Summary

Senate Bill 126 focuses on the procedures and compensation practices related to recall repairs for motor vehicles in Louisiana. The bill amends existing laws to establish clearer definitions and guidelines concerning compensation that manufacturers owe to their franchised new motor vehicle dealers for repairs needed due to federal safety recalls. Specifically, it ensures that dealers are compensated for labor and parts required to perform these repairs, even when the manufacturer delays in providing necessary parts. This aims to protect dealers financially during the waiting period for recall remedies to become available.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 126 appears to have been generally positive, particularly among motor vehicle dealers and associations advocating for their interests. Proponents likely view the bill as a necessary step to ensure fairness and clarity in the compensation process, which aligns with broader consumer safety objectives. However, there may be concerns from manufacturers about the financial implications of the new compensation requirements, leading to a mixed reception among industry stakeholders.

Contention

One notable point of contention relates to concerns from manufacturers regarding the financial burden imposed by SB 126. Manufacturers may argue that the regulations could lead to increased costs for compliance and affect their ability to maintain profit margins. This tension between protecting dealer interests and manufacturers' cost control measures highlights the ongoing negotiations surrounding recall processes in the automotive industry.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB561

Hazardous waste: Emergency Distress Flare Safe Disposal Act.

NH HB1358

Relative to tenant and contract manufacturers of beer, wine, and liquor; allowing pharmacists to administer influenza, COVID-19, and other FDA licensed vaccines without explicit approval from the general court; and, restricting the purchase of real property on or around military installations.

CA AB2754

Alcoholic beverage control.

CA SB1445

Electric mobility manufacturers.

CA SB788

Beer manufacturers: cider and perry.

CA AB326

Electric mobility manufacturers.

CA AB1211

Electric mobility manufacturers.

CA SB1420

Licensed beer manufacturers: nonlicensee products: storage.