Louisiana 2018 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB187

Introduced
2/28/18  
Refer
2/28/18  
Refer
3/12/18  

Caption

Provides relative to acquisition or change of control of state-chartered financial institutions or holding companies. (8/1/18)

Impact

By enforcing this requirement, the bill aims to ensure that any new controllers of financial institutions possess the necessary competence and integrity, ultimately protecting depositors and the public interest. The application process includes a review period of up to 60 days within which the commissioner must approve or disapprove of the acquisition. This structured oversight seeks to mitigate risks associated with changes in control that could adversely affect the financial stability of institutions and, by extension, the economic health of the state.

Summary

Senate Bill 187 proposes a regulatory framework for the acquisition or change of control of state-chartered financial institutions and their holding companies in Louisiana. The bill outlines specific definitions such as 'control', which refers to the ability to direct management or vote a significant portion of voting securities (25% or more). It establishes that any person wishing to acquire such control must obtain permission from the commissioner responsible for overseeing financial institutions and must file an application at least 90 days prior to the proposed acquisition date.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB187 appears largely supportive within financial regulatory circles, emphasizing the need for oversight in the financial sector. Stakeholders, including regulatory agencies, may view the bill as a necessary step to safeguard public confidence in financial institutions. However, there could also be concerns regarding the potential for regulatory overreach or delays that might stifle legitimate business transactions. Thus, while the bill is well-received by proponents of financial stability, it may face scrutiny from those worried about excessive regulation.

Contention

Notable points of contention could arise around the definitions and thresholds set for control, particularly if they are seen as too stringent or unclear by those looking to invest in or acquire state-chartered financial institutions. Additionally, the impact on potential acquirers—especially smaller entities—could be a topic of debate, as some may argue that the requirements could deter new investments or acquisitions in the financial sector, thereby impacting competition and innovation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1176

Department of Financial Protection and Innovation: loan-related activities: data analysis and practices.

CA AB801

Financial institutions: California Community Reinvestment Act.

KY SB16

AN ACT relating to special purpose depository institutions.

WV HB3269

Reorganizing the Board of Banking and Financial Institutions, the Division of Financial Institutions, and the Lending and Credit Rate Board

TX HB17

Relating to the establishment of the Texas Higher Education Innovation Accelerator for public institutions of higher education.

TX HB3610

Relating to the establishment of the Texas Higher Education Innovation Accelerator for public institutions of higher education.

RI H5564

Establishes an economic growth blockchain, regulates virtual and digital assets, and establishes depository banks for these purposes.

NJ A4362

Provides for designation and establishment of Public Health Institute in New Jersey.