Louisiana 2018 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB22

Introduced
2/14/18  
Refer
2/14/18  
Refer
2/14/18  
Refer
3/12/18  
Refer
3/12/18  
Report Pass
3/14/18  
Engrossed
3/20/18  
Engrossed
3/20/18  
Refer
3/21/18  
Refer
3/21/18  
Report Pass
4/23/18  
Report Pass
4/23/18  
Enrolled
5/9/18  
Enrolled
5/9/18  
Chaptered
5/15/18  

Caption

Provides relative to the membership of the Poverty Point Reservoir District Board of Commissioners. (gov sig)

Impact

By expanding the Board of Commissioners, the bill aims to introduce diverse perspectives in the decision-making processes relevant to the Poverty Point Reservoir, which is crucial for water supply and management in the region. This change is likely to impact the operational dynamics of the Board, as the new member will represent either another facet of local governance or specialized knowledge, potentially leading to more comprehensive strategies that address regional water issues.

Summary

Senate Bill 22 (SB22) facilitates changes in the governance of the Poverty Point Reservoir District by increasing the number of commissioners on its Board from nine to ten. This legislative alteration allows for an additional gubernatorial appointment, enhancing the state's control over the board's composition. The bill reflects a shift toward an empowered governance structure intended to bolster the management of the reservoir and its associated resources.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around SB22 appears to be favorable among legislators as evidenced by its unanimous passing in the House (93-0). Supporters of the bill argue that enhancing the Board's composition will better equip it to handle the various challenges that arise in water management and local governance. The bill gained traction as stakeholders recognized the need for additional oversight and representation in this vital area.

Contention

While there seems to be general support for the bill, potential contentions could arise regarding the implications of gubernatorial appointments on local authority and decision-making autonomy. Critics may argue that increasing state control through additional appointments could diminish the influence of local interests and stakeholder engagement in crucial water management issues, ultimately leading to one-size-fits-all solutions that may not be tailored to the unique needs of the communities affected by the reservoir.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.