Louisiana 2019 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB180

Introduced
3/26/19  
Introduced
3/26/19  
Refer
3/26/19  
Refer
4/8/19  
Refer
4/8/19  
Report Pass
4/24/19  
Report Pass
4/24/19  
Engrossed
5/2/19  
Engrossed
5/2/19  
Refer
5/6/19  
Refer
5/6/19  
Report Pass
5/14/19  
Report Pass
5/14/19  
Enrolled
5/21/19  
Enrolled
5/21/19  
Chaptered
5/24/19  
Chaptered
5/24/19  
Passed
5/24/19  

Caption

Creates the crime of interfering with emergency communication

Impact

With the enactment of HB 180, Louisiana would introduce specific penalties for those found guilty of this offense, which may include a fine of up to $500, imprisonment for up to six months, or both. This legislation reflects a proactive approach to protect emergency communications — an essential service for public safety. The criminalization of such interference highlights the necessity of maintaining the integrity of communication channels, especially during emergencies.

Summary

House Bill 180 creates the crime of interfering with emergency communication in the state of Louisiana. This legislation defines interference as actions that disconnect, damage, disable, remove, or use intimidation to block access to any telecommunications device preventing individuals from contacting emergency services such as 911, obtaining medical assistance, or reporting to law enforcement. The bill aims to bolster public safety by ensuring that individuals can reliably access emergency services without obstruction.

Sentiment

There was strong support for HB 180 among legislators, which is evident from the unanimous vote in favor (35-0) during the Senate's final passage of the bill. Supporters argue that this law is critical for preserving public safety and ensuring that emergency response systems are accessed without hindrance. The sentiment surrounding the bill is largely positive as it addresses a potential gap in public safety measures.

Contention

While the discussion around HB 180 appears to be generally favorable, underlying it is the broader concern about civil rights and the potential implications of penalizing individuals for acts that may not be straightforwardly malicious. Some advocates express the need for clear definitions and delineations to ensure that innocent actions, or unintentional interferences, do not lead to unjust penalties. The balance between enforcing the law and protecting individual rights remains an important consideration in discussions around this legislation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.