Louisiana House Bill HB470

Louisiana 2019 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/19
• Refer: 3/29/19
• Refer: 4/8/19

Caption

Provides for the merger of Louisiana Tech University and Louisiana State University at Shreveport (OR INCREASE GF EX See Note)

Impact

The merger's impact on state laws primarily involves shifting the management and oversight of LSU-S to the UL System board, which could lead to revised funding allocations and operational governance mechanisms. The bill prevents the LSU board from making personnel changes or altering budget allocations without UL System approval during the transition period. Furthermore, it stipulates that all pending obligations related to LSU-S be carried over to the UL System to ensure financial stability and accountability throughout the merger process.

Summary

HB470 proposes the transfer of Louisiana State University at Shreveport (LSU-S) from the LSU System to the University of Louisiana System (UL System), along with the merger of LSU-S with Louisiana Tech University. This legislative act is significant as it seeks to consolidate resources and administrative functions, aiming for enhanced operational efficiency within Louisiana's higher education framework. The bill outlines specific requirements for compliance with the Southern Association for Colleges and Schools (SACS) and establishes a timeline for the transition process, which includes the necessary communication and procedures to effectuate the merger and transfer of governance.

Sentiment

General sentiment around HB470 appears to favor the consolidation of educational institutions in Louisiana as a means to optimize resources and improve educational outcomes. Proponents argue that this merger could create a stronger academic entity that enhances the state's higher education landscape. However, concerns may arise regarding potential job losses, program reductions, or shifts in institutional identity, particularly for students and faculty members at LSU-S who are apprehensive about the transition and its implications for their educational and professional futures.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential for reduced funding and resources that could disproportionately affect LSU-S during and after the merger. Legislators and stakeholders have expressed worries about the effectiveness of oversight during the transition phase and the risk of diminishing the unique contributions that LSU-S provides to its local community. Additionally, the specifics of how staff and faculty tenure will be affected has raised questions, as staff members seek guarantees regarding their employment status and working conditions post-merger.