Louisiana House Bill HB964

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12
• Report Pass: 5/8/12

Caption

Provides for the merger of Louisiana Tech and LSU-Shreveport (OR INCREASE GF EX See Note)

Impact

The bill aims to create a more integrated postsecondary education system within the Shreveport-Bossier region, with a focus on enhancing educational attainment and improving the overall quality of life. It provides a structure for managing the transfer and merging of LSU-S into La. Tech while ensuring that students currently enrolled at LSU-S can continue their education seamlessly. Furthermore, it emphasizes the need for adequate funding and the development of policies that will address employment status and tenure of LSU-S staff after the merger, thereby affording them protection and continuity.

Summary

House Bill 964, introduced by Representative Fannin and Senator Walsworth, focuses on the merger between Louisiana State University at Shreveport (LSU-S) and Louisiana Tech University (La. Tech). The bill outlines the procedural framework for transferring LSU-S from the LSU System to the University of Louisiana System (UL System), including the transfer of assets, obligations, and resources associated with the institution. The intended date for the governance change and merger is predicated on the receipt of approval from the Southern Association for Colleges and Schools (SACS), highlighting the necessity of ensuring compliance with institutional accreditation standards throughout the transition process.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 964 is generally supportive among legislators who advocate for the potential benefits of the merger, including improved educational resources and operational efficiencies. However, some concerns remain regarding how the merger will affect existing students and faculty at both institutions, particularly regarding changes to policies, funding allocations, and the potential loss of unique identities among the institutions involved. The legislative discussions reflect a desire for a balanced approach that reinforces educational quality while addressing the concerns of various stakeholders in the academic community.

Contention

Notable points of contention include apprehensions from faculty and administrative personnel about job security, the implementation timeline, and changes in educational programs and structures resulting from the merger. The transition period requires meticulous planning to avoid disruption in the educational services provided to students. Legislators and stakeholders emphasize the importance of transparent communication and diligent oversight during the process to ensure that the goals of the merger align with the educational needs of the community it serves.