Provides relative to the amount DPS&C pays for the housing of state inmates in a parish jail or institution (EN +$6,486,618 GF EX See Note)
This bill represents a significant change in how the state compensates local jurisdictions for the costs associated with holding state inmates. By increasing the financial support for local sheriffs, the legislation strives to alleviate some financial pressure from parish jails, which often bear a substantial fiscal burden for housing state prisoners. Additionally, the bill mandates that DPS&C work collaboratively with parish authorities to enhance support programs, such as treatment and educational programming for inmates, addressing rehabilitation efforts during periods of incarceration.
House Bill 551 seeks to amend the provisions regarding the confinement of individuals committed to the custody of the Department of Public Safety and Corrections (DPS&C) within parish jails. The bill aims to increase the daily payment made by the state to local sheriffs for housing inmates who are awaiting transfer to state correctional facilities. Specifically, the legislation raises the daily compensation for each inmate confined in a parish jail from 24 to 25 dollars for the fiscal year 2019-2020, with subsequent increases in following years.
The sentiment surrounding HB 551 appears to be largely positive, particularly among law enforcement and local government officials who may benefit from the increased funding for inmate housing. Supporters argue that the adjustments made by this bill will provide much-needed financial relief that allows parish jails to improve their services and potentially enhance inmate rehabilitation options. However, the ramifications of increased state spending and the potential impact on state budgets may concern fiscal conservatives.
Notably, there might be contention regarding the adequacy of the proposed increases in payment for the daily housing of inmates relative to the actual costs incurred by parish jails. Some stakeholders may question whether the adjustments are sufficient to cover rising costs associated with providing necessary services and maintaining standards in jail facilities. Furthermore, there are concerns about how effectively the collaborative approach between DPS&C and local authorities will be implemented, particularly regarding the expansion of required programming for inmates.