Louisiana House Bill HCR87

Louisiana 2019 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/15/19
• Refer: 5/16/19
• Refer: 5/21/19
• Engrossed: 5/28/19
• Refer: 5/29/19
• Passed: 6/5/19

Caption

Provides for the Louisiana Commission on Justice System Funding

Impact

The establishment of the Louisiana Commission on Justice System Funding would significantly impact how the criminal justice system is financed in Louisiana. The commission's objectives include studying the financial obligations of defendants, tracking funding sources, and identifying methods to ensure a fair and stable court funding system. This change is essential to reduce the financial strains on former offenders, which studies have indicated can contribute to recidivism and further public safety issues. Additionally, it aims to ensure that victim restitution is prioritized within these financial obligations.

Summary

HCR87, also known as the Louisiana Commission on Justice System Funding, seeks to establish a commission dedicated to evaluating and improving the funding mechanisms of the state's criminal justice system. The bill addresses growing concerns over the reliance on fines, fees, and court costs imposed on individuals convicted of crimes, which often lead to excessive financial burdens that hamper successful reentry into society. By creating a commission, the bill aims to enhance transparency and stability in the funding sources for Louisiana's courts and facilitate the implementation of legislative changes enacted by prior acts, specifically Act No. 260 of 2017.

Sentiment

General sentiment towards HCR87 is largely supportive, particularly among those advocating for justice reform and improved funding accountability. Supporters argue that restructuring funding sources will alleviate burdens on individuals reentering society and enhance the effectiveness of the criminal justice system. However, there may be reservations from other stakeholders concerned about the implications of shifting funding strategies and the potential impacts on the overall budgeting of the state’s criminal justice system.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance of financial responsibilities between the state and individual offenders and the effectiveness of funding derived from fines and fees to truly meet the needs of the justice system. Critics may question whether creating a commission will lead to tangible improvements in funding practices or whether it merely adds another layer to the bureaucratic process without addressing the core issues at hand. The ongoing discussion surrounding the implications of Act No. 260 further complicates the conversation, as stakeholders evaluate the changes made in that legislation and their impact on the ongoing funding debate.