Louisiana Senate Bill SR226

Louisiana 2019 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/31/19
• Passed: 6/1/19

Caption

Requests BESE to reconvene the Minimum Foundation Program Task Force to determine the actual cost of providing public education in Louisiana.

Impact

This resolution aims to fulfill the constitutional mandate that requires the state legislature to provide for public education and create an equitable formula for funding. By reconvening the MFP Task Force, it seeks to address longstanding concerns related to educational funding adequacy and fairness across school districts. The findings and recommendations from the task force are intended to inform legislators on how best to meet the educational needs of diverse student populations throughout the state.

Summary

Senate Resolution 226, introduced by Senator Boudreaux, urges the State Board of Elementary and Secondary Education (BESE) to reconvene the Minimum Foundation Program (MFP) Task Force. The task force is expected to examine the actual costs of providing public education in Louisiana and identify potential funding mechanisms to support school systems in meeting these costs. The resolution emphasizes the importance of ensuring that all students have an equal opportunity to succeed and thrive in a supportive learning environment.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SR226 appears to be generally supportive among education stakeholders, who recognize the need for a thorough evaluation of the MFP formula to ensure adequate funding for public education. Many believe that revisiting the formula will help address disparities in funding and resources available to different school systems. However, potential contention may arise from differing perspectives on how to fund education and the allocation of resources once the task force evaluates costs and mechanisms.

Contestation

While SR226 calls for the reconvening of the MFP Task Force, there could be debates regarding the approach to funding identified by the task force. Issues such as budget allocations, potential increases in taxes or reallocation of existing funds, and the prioritization of certain educational needs over others may lead to discussions or objections from various stakeholders, including lawmakers and community members. These points of contention could influence how recommendations from the task force are implemented into law.