Louisiana 2020 2nd Special Session

Louisiana House Bill HB10

Introduced
9/25/20  
Introduced
9/25/20  
Refer
9/28/20  
Refer
9/28/20  
Refer
9/28/20  
Report Pass
10/6/20  
Report Pass
10/6/20  
Engrossed
10/13/20  
Engrossed
10/13/20  
Report Pass
10/15/20  
Report Pass
10/15/20  
Enrolled
10/21/20  
Enrolled
10/21/20  
Chaptered
10/28/20  
Chaptered
10/28/20  

Caption

Authorizes the transfer of certain state property in Jackson Parish (Item #54)

Impact

The legislation conveys a specific parcel of land from state possession to a local law enforcement entity, reflecting a commitment to enhance local resources for public safety. Additionally, the proceeds from the property sale are directed into the Accommodation for Breast-feeding and Lactation Room Fund, which supports initiatives related to breastfeeding within state facilities. This funding mechanism underscores the state's intention to promote maternal and child health through dedicated financial allocations.

Summary

House Bill 10, passed during the 2020 Second Extraordinary Session, authorizes the transfer of state property located at 244 Bond Street in Jonesboro, Louisiana, to the Jackson Parish Sheriff's Office. The bill stipulates that while the property can be conveyed, the mineral rights associated with it will be reserved. This transfer is intended to provide necessary space for the Sheriff's operations and is executed under the jurisdiction of the commissioner of administration and the secretary of the Department of Children and Family Services.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 10 appears to be generally positive, with broad support for measures that bolster local government capacity. The transfer to the Sheriff's Office was seen as a pertinent move to equip law enforcement with necessary facilities. Furthermore, the allocation of proceeds to support breastfeeding initiatives indicates a proactive approach to public health, which is likely to resonate well with community advocates and health policymakers.

Contention

While there is no significant recorded opposition to this bill, the implications of transferring state properties can often be a point of discussion. Concerns generally revolve around transparency in valuation and the appropriateness of reserving mineral rights, which might affect future state revenues while prioritizing local needs. Nonetheless, the bill successfully passed without dissent, indicating a consensus on the utility of the property transfer.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.