Louisiana 2020 2nd Special Session

Louisiana House Bill HB84

Introduced
10/5/20  
Refer
10/5/20  
Report Pass
10/6/20  
Report Pass
10/6/20  
Engrossed
10/13/20  
Report Pass
10/20/20  
Report Pass
10/20/20  
Enrolled
10/23/20  
Vetoed
11/9/20  

Caption

Provides relative to the expenditure of federal funds received as a result of a disaster or emergency (Item #27) (EN SEE FISC NOTE FF EX See Note)

Impact

The implications of HB84 are significant for how state funds are managed in response to emergencies. By providing agencies with the ability to utilize federal funds quickly when a disaster or emergency arises, the bill enhances the state’s responsiveness. However, it simultaneously raises questions about the oversight of such expenditures and ensures legislative scrutiny at subsequent committee meetings, fostering accountability for funds spent without prior approval.

Summary

House Bill 84 focuses on the expenditure of federal funds received in response to disasters or emergencies. The bill modifies the current requirements that govern how these funds can be spent by altering the conditions under which the Joint Legislative Committee on the Budget can approve such expenditures. Specifically, the bill allows for expedited spending of these funds without prior committee approval when certification of urgency is provided by an agency’s secretary, addressing situations where immediate action is necessary to avoid detriment to the state. This aims to streamline the process of accessing federal aid during critical times.

Sentiment

General sentiment towards HB84 appears to be supportive, particularly among those who emphasize the need for rapid governmental action during crises. Stakeholders have generally appreciated the bill’s potential to prevent bureaucratic delays in fund allocation. However, there exists a concern among some legislators regarding the balance of power and the potential risks of diminishing legislative oversight during emergencies, sparking a debate on the right level of control in emergencies versus the need for expediency.

Contention

Notable points of contention center around the appropriateness of allowing expenditures without immediate legislative approval. Critics of this approach may argue that it could lead to a lack of transparency and reduced accountability for spending practices during emergencies. The bill establishes regulations that require agencies to eventually report expenditures to the Joint Legislative Committee on the Budget, yet the initial loophole allowing fund expenditure raises concerns about unregulated spending and oversight in future legislative sessions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

NJ AR96

Changes membership of Budget and Labor Committees; clarifies that bill or resolution may be listed on committee agenda for purposes of amendment.

MI HB4870

Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; funds donated to a candidate for recall efforts; require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.

MI HB4326

Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; provision related to officeholders raising funds when facing a recall; modify, and require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.

MN HC6

A concurrent resolution recognizing wild rice as sacred and central to the culture and health of Indigenous Peoples in Minnesota and critical to the health and identity of all Minnesota citizens and ecosystems and establishing a commitment to passing legislation to protect wild rice and the freshwater resources upon which it depends.

CA SB602

Advisory bodies.

CA SB1048

Advisory bodies.

CA AB3239

Advisory bodies.

KS HR6003

Providing temporary rules of the House of Representatives for the 2023 session until permanent rules are adopted.