Louisiana 2020 2nd Special Session

Louisiana House Bill HCR2

Introduced
9/28/20  
Introduced
9/28/20  
Refer
9/28/20  
Refer
9/28/20  
Report Pass
10/12/20  
Engrossed
10/14/20  
Refer
10/15/20  
Refer
10/15/20  
Report Pass
10/21/20  
Report Pass
10/21/20  
Passed
10/22/20  

Caption

Urges and requests the Louisiana Attorney General to investigate certain companies doing business in the state to determine if the companies have engaged in prohibited activities

Impact

HCR2 reflects the growing concern regarding internet service providers' accountability and the need for customer protection in Louisiana. The resolution cites numerous complaints about Suddenlink's alleged failure to deliver services, poor customer communication, and potentially deceptive trade practices. If the investigation yields findings of wrongdoing, it could lead to significant regulatory changes and enforcement actions, impacting how telecommunications companies operate within the state.

Summary

House Concurrent Resolution 2 (HCR2) urges the Louisiana Attorney General and relevant federal agencies to investigate Altice USA and Suddenlink Communications for possible violations of state and federal law. The resolution arises in the context of increasing reliance on internet connectivity, especially highlighted during the COVID-19 pandemic. It acknowledges that many Louisianans depend on internet service for education, telemedicine, and small business activities, emphasizing the critical nature of reliable communication services.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HCR2 is one of urgency and advocacy for consumer rights. Lawmakers and constituents alike express frustration with the service quality and reliability offered by Altice USA and Suddenlink. The resolution highlights a bipartisan agreement on the necessity of investigating these companies to ensure compliance with both state and federal standards, aiming to protect the interests of Louisiana's citizens, particularly during challenging times such as a pandemic or natural disaster.

Contention

While HCR2 is positioned as a consumer protection measure, there may be underlying tensions regarding the role of state versus federal oversight of telecommunications. Some stakeholders may argue that additional investigations could lead to overregulation or may discourage business operations in Louisiana. However, the prevailing view among those supporting the resolution indicates a need to address any unfair practices and enhance service reliability rather than stifle business activity.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

LA HCR84

Directs the La. State Law Institute to reorganize and recodify the Miscellaneous Health Provisions chapter of Title 40 of the La. Revised Statutes

LA HCR196

Urges and requests a study of the means by which the La. State Board of Nursing may obtain access to investigative records

LA HCR173

Requests that the Bd. of Regents and the State Bd. of Elementary and Secondary Education, with the Taylor Foundation, La. Office of Student Financial Assistance, public postsecondary education management boards, and certain others, study certain issues relative to TOPS

LA HCR104

Requests the Louisiana Workforce Commission and the Louisiana Department of Veterans Affairs to study employment practices and professional licensing requirements to benefit veterans in the workforce

LA HB874

Makes supplemental appropriations for Fiscal Year 2017-2018

LA SB31

Provides for the repeal of certain inactive or obsolete healthcare laws. (8/1/22)

LA SB212

Provides for the membership of the Prescription Monitoring Program Advisory Council. (8/15/10)

LA SCR65

Creates a task force to study meaningful oversight of the professional healthcare licensing boards statutorily created within the Department of Health and Hospitals.