Provides a limitation of liability for donating certain wild game
Impact
If enacted, HB 35 would significantly affect laws regarding food donations in Louisiana. It reinforces the protection for donors of wild game, fostering an environment where food banks can operate more freely without fear of legal repercussions associated with the condition of donated food. This could potentially enhance the supply of food available for distribution, particularly to individuals and families requiring emergency food assistance, including the elderly, sick, or disabled.
Summary
House Bill 35 aims to provide a limitation of liability for individuals and entities that donate wild game to food banks or for redistribution to those in need. The bill establishes that no person can bring a lawsuit against food banks or the donors of such wild game for damages arising from the donated game, unless the damages were due to intentional acts or omissions by the donor or food distributor. The purpose of the bill is to encourage the donation of wild game and alleviate food scarcity among vulnerable populations.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HB 35 appears to be generally positive among legislators, as the bill received overwhelming support during voting, with a final passage vote of 33-0 in the Senate. Supporters likely see it as a proactive step towards addressing food insecurity and promoting communal support programs. While detailed opposition responses are not indicated, the implied benefits suggest a consensus around enhancing food donation mechanisms.
Contention
The notable point of contention may arise from the implications of the bill regarding the liability protections offered to donors. While the bill is designed to increase food donations, critics may challenge the idea that it sufficiently safeguards recipients against poor quality or unsafe food products. Ensuring both increased donation rates and maintaining the health and safety standards of donated items could be areas of further discussion as the bill is implemented.