Louisiana 2020 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB378

Introduced
2/27/20  
Introduced
2/27/20  
Refer
2/27/20  
Refer
3/9/20  
Report Pass
5/7/20  
Engrossed
5/18/20  
Report Pass
5/27/20  
Enrolled
5/29/20  
Enrolled
5/29/20  
Chaptered
6/9/20  

Caption

Provides relative to compensation for members of the Washington Parish planning commission

Impact

The enactment of HB 378 represents a significant shift in the regulatory framework governing the operation of planning commissions in Louisiana. By permitting compensation for members, the bill effectively enhances the attractiveness of serving on the commission, potentially leading to a more engaged and effective body. This change could also set a precedent for similar adjustments in other parishes, further influencing how local governance structures operate within the state.

Summary

House Bill 378 aims to amend existing legislation concerning the Washington Parish planning commission by allowing its members to receive compensation for their attendance at meetings. Specifically, the bill authorizes the governing authority of Washington Parish to pay a per diem ranging from twenty-five to sixty dollars, for a maximum of twenty-four meetings per year. This change is intended to provide financial recognition to commission members for their commitment and service to planning activities within the parish.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 378 appears to be positive, particularly among those favoring increased compensation for public service roles. Supporters argue that the bill not only recognizes the efforts of commission members but also encourages greater participation in local governance. However, there may be some concern about the economic implications of allocating parish funds for per diem payments, which could lead to debates regarding budgeting and resource allocation.

Contention

While the bill has garnered support, it is not without contention. Critics may argue that introducing compensation could politicize what is traditionally a volunteer role and raise concerns about the management of public funds. Moreover, there could be discussions on whether such changes could impact the impartiality and objectivity of commission members in fulfilling their planning responsibilities. The debate centers around balancing appropriate compensation for services rendered while safeguarding the integrity of public service.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.