Provides relative to criteria for a student's receipt of a State Seal of Biliteracy on his high school diploma or transcript
The retroactive application of the bill extends back to August 1, 2014, which allows students who graduated since that date to benefit from the revised criteria. By enhancing the criteria for the State Seal of Biliteracy, this bill encourages high school students to develop language skills that may benefit their future academic and professional endeavors. The incorporation of SAT concordant scores is particularly significant, as it makes the seal more accessible to a broader range of students who may have performed better on the SAT compared to the ACT.
House Bill 761 aims to expand the criteria for awarding the State Seal of Biliteracy to high school graduates in Louisiana. This seal recognizes students who demonstrate proficiency in multiple languages, signifying their ability to communicate effectively in an increasingly global environment. The proposed law retains the requirement for students to complete certain graduation prerequisites while introducing an alternative means of fulfilling testing criteria through concordant scores from the SAT, alongside the existing ACT score requirements.
The sentiment surrounding HB 761 appears to be positive among educational advocates and stakeholders who support the promotion of multilingualism among students. By recognizing and rewarding language proficiency, the bill is likely perceived as a means to prepare students for global citizenship and expand their career opportunities. Educational institutions and policymakers may see this as a progressive step toward enhancing academic standards and student readiness in a diverse and interconnected world.
While there are noted benefits, discussions around HB 761 may raise contentions related to the adequacy of the proposed testing measures and whether they comprehensively assess a student's language abilities. Some critics might argue that relying on standardized test scores could overlook students who are proficient in less commonly tested languages or who have not performed well in a testing environment. The implications of these changes on school curricula and resources devoted to language education may also be points of debate among educators and legislators.