Louisiana 2020 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB778

Introduced
3/31/20  
Introduced
3/31/20  
Refer
5/4/20  

Caption

Provides for the limitation of liability during a declaration of a state of public health emergency

Impact

The passage of HB 778 is expected to influence state laws related to liability during public health emergencies, particularly by providing legal protections to those who assist the state in response efforts. By amending R.S. 29:771(B)(2)(c) and (d), the bill clarifies that both individual healthcare providers and corporations acting under the state's request are protected from litigation, thereby promoting immediate response and support during emergencies. This limited liability framework is anticipated to facilitate a more robust healthcare response in times of crisis.

Summary

House Bill 778, proposed by Representative Villio, aims to limit the liability of healthcare providers and private entities during a declared public health emergency in Louisiana. The bill modifies the Louisiana Health Emergency Powers Act to ensure that these entities will not be held civilly liable for harm or damages caused during such emergencies, barring cases of gross negligence or willful misconduct. The intent is to encourage healthcare professionals and private firms to offer assistance without the fear of legal repercussions, which could be especially vital during a health crisis.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 778 appears to be supportive, particularly among legislators and stakeholders within the healthcare community who view the bill as a necessary measure to protect those who step forward during emergencies. Proponents argue that it is essential to ensure that healthcare providers can focus on delivering care without fearing the threat of lawsuits. However, there may be concerns about the balance of accountability and safety, as some may view these liability protections as a potential loophole that could shield negligent behavior in certain situations.

Contention

Some potential points of contention arise regarding the definition of 'gross negligence' and 'willful misconduct'. Critics might argue that while the bill aims to facilitate a prompt response to health emergencies, it could unintentionally create an environment where lapses in care or improper actions go unpunished. It is crucial that legislators strike a balance between encouraging emergency assistance and maintaining accountability to ensure public trust in the healthcare system during crises.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.