Louisiana 2020 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB115

Introduced
2/24/20  
Introduced
2/24/20  
Refer
2/24/20  
Refer
3/9/20  
Refer
3/9/20  
Report Pass
5/13/20  
Engrossed
5/15/20  
Engrossed
5/15/20  
Refer
5/18/20  
Refer
5/18/20  
Report Pass
5/20/20  
Report Pass
5/20/20  
Enrolled
5/31/20  
Enrolled
5/31/20  
Chaptered
6/11/20  
Passed
6/11/20  

Caption

Provides relative to advertisements for legal services. (1/1/21)

Impact

If enacted, SB 115 would amend existing regulations to enhance consumer protection in the legal services marketplace. By requiring attorneys to clearly disclose their fees in advertisements, the bill seeks to mitigate the potential for confusion and deception that could adversely affect prospective clients. The Louisiana Supreme Court is also empowered to implement additional rules to further enforce these provisions, adding a layer of regulatory oversight aimed at promoting honesty in legal advertising.

Summary

Senate Bill 115 aims to regulate advertisements for legal services in order to increase transparency and protect potential clients from misleading information regarding attorney fees. The bill mandates that any advertisement referencing a monetary settlement or jury verdict must also disclose all attorney fees associated with that settlement or verdict. This information must be presented in a clear and prominent manner, ensuring that individuals seeking legal representation can make informed decisions based on the financial implications involved.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB 115 has been positive among supporters who argue that it promotes transparency and helps wary clients to navigate the often complex nature of legal services. The bill has garnered bipartisan support, reflecting a shared concern over the ethical implications of misleading legal advertisements. However, some legal professionals express apprehension about the new requirements, worrying that stringent regulations may inadvertently stifle creativity and customization in legal marketing.

Contention

Despite its intent to protect consumers, there are points of contention regarding the implementation of these advertising rules. Critics argue that the requirement to disclose attorney fees alongside settlements could diminish the impact of successful case outcomes showcased in advertisements. Additionally, there may be concerns about how these regulations could be enforced and whether they might inadvertently restrict legitimate marketing practices that are crucial for law firms, especially smaller or less established ones, to attract new clients.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB921

Political Reform Act of 1974: digital political advertisements.

CA AB868

Political Reform Act of 1974: digital political advertisements.

CA AB794

Cannabis: advertising and marketing restrictions.

CA AB2716

Cannabis: advertisements: highways.

CA AB1175

Outdoor advertising displays: redevelopment agency project areas.

CA AB2546

Commercial email advertisements.

CA SB405

Outdoor advertising displays: exemptions: City of Artesia.

CA AB1982

Outdoor advertising displays: exemptions: City of Artesia.