Requests the federal Office of Management and Budget to maintain the current minimum population Standard for Delineating Metropolitan and Micropolitan Statistical Areas.
SCR33 highlights the negative implications of changing the metropolitan designation threshold, emphasizing that it could disrupt the flow of federal funding vital for localities struggling economically. Specifically, it could hamper programs designed to support infrastructure improvements and community revitalization efforts. Cities that rely heavily on federal support for housing renovations, alleviating lead hazards, and developing safe housing would directly suffer if their designations changed, leading to adverse economic impacts.
Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 33 (SCR33) urges the federal Office of Management and Budget to maintain the current population standards for delineating metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas at a minimum of fifty thousand residents. The resolution responds to a recommendation that would raise this threshold to one hundred thousand, a change that would result in cities like Alexandria and Hammond, Louisiana losing their metropolitan designations. This loss would impact the availability of federal resources essential for community development and economic assistance, especially in the wake of the pandemic.
The sentiment around SCR33 appears to be predominantly supportive among legislators, reflecting a consensus on the importance of retaining the population threshold. The voting history indicates a strong bipartisan agreement, with the house vote recording 93 in favor and none against, suggesting that lawmakers recognize the necessity of these federal funds for local economies. Supporters argue that maintaining the existing standards is crucial for sustaining economic growth and fostering community resilience during recovery phases.
While the resolution enjoys broad support, some contention may arise from differing perspectives on federal regulations and funding formulas. A shift towards a higher population threshold could be viewed by some as an effort to streamline federal resource allocation; however, proponents of SCR33 argue that such a shift would overlook the unique needs of smaller communities. The discussions surrounding SCR33 reflect a deeper concern over maintaining equitable access to federal funding for underserved areas, underscoring the importance of inclusive economic policies.