Louisiana 2022 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB813

Introduced
3/15/22  
Introduced
3/15/22  
Refer
3/16/22  
Refer
3/16/22  
Report Pass
5/4/22  

Caption

Enacts the Abolition of Abortion in Louisiana Act of 2022 (EGF INCREASE GF EX See Note)

Impact

The implications of HB 813 are significant, as it is designed to enforce state laws regarding abortion without acknowledgement of the U.S. Supreme Court decisions associated with Roe v. Wade and its progeny. This representation of the bill creates a legal framework that could lead to conflicts between state and federal laws, particularly regarding reproductive health care. Supporters argue that this law reinforces the sanctity of life and protects the unborn, while opponents view it as a blatant disregard for women's rights and healthcare autonomy.

Summary

House Bill 813, known as the 'Abolition of Abortion in Louisiana Act of 2022', aims to fundamentally redefine the status and rights of unborn children by recognizing them as full persons from the moment of fertilization. This bill amends existing Louisiana law to clarify the definitions of 'person' and 'unborn child', effectively expanding legal protections previously limited to born individuals. The intent of the legislation is to ensure that unborn children are granted the same rights and legal protections as other citizens under Louisiana law, effectively making abortion illegal in the state.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 813 is highly polarized. Proponents, primarily advocates for the pro-life movement, celebrate the bill as a critical step toward eliminating abortion and safeguarding unborn lives. Conversely, opponents, including women's rights organizations and healthcare advocates, fiercely criticize the bill, describing it as a regressive and harmful measure that would endanger women's health and limit their rights to make personal medical decisions.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the bill's outright refutation of federal law and court rulings, particularly the implications of ignoring the U.S. Supreme Court's authority. By allowing state authorities to disregard federal rulings regarding the rights of the unborn, the law is likely to incite legal battles that question the balance of federal versus state powers. Additionally, there are concerns regarding potential lack of support for women facing unplanned pregnancies, as well as the implications for healthcare providers who might fear legal ramifications for offering care that could be seen as violating this law.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

WV HB3332

Creating judicial circuits and assigning the number of circuit judges in each circuit to be elected in the 2024 election

WV HB3330

Creating family court circuits and assigning the number of family court judges in each family court circuit to be elected in the 2024 election

WV HB3329

Creating judicial circuits and assigning the number of circuit judges in each circuit to be elected in the 2024 election

NJ SCR73

Proposes constitutional amendment authorizing Legislature to invalidate certain court decisions.

NJ SCR72

Proposes constitutional amendment authorizing Legislature to invalidate certain court decisions.

NJ SCR96

Proposes temporary constitutional amendment allowing State constitutional convention convened to reform system of property taxation to propose statutory changes.

NJ SCR83

Proposes temporary constitutional amendment allowing State constitutional convention convened to reform system of property taxation to propose statutory changes.

CA ACA13

Voting thresholds.