Appropriates funds for payment of the consent judgment against the state in the suit entitled James Geduldick v. Amanda Fagane et al. c/w Ronald L. Courtney and Rebecca L. Morris v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al.
Impact
The implications of HB 853 signal a decisive action by the state to comply with legal obligations stemming from this lawsuit. In doing so, it establishes a framework for how such judgments are to be processed and honored, particularly in terms of funding from the state treasury. The state aims to demonstrate fiscal responsibility by ensuring that the appropriate sums are allocated in a timely manner to meet the financial obligations set forth by the court ruling. By doing so, the bill indirectly underscores the importance of honoring legal judgments to maintain the integrity of the judicial process.
Summary
House Bill 853 is a piece of legislation that focuses on appropriating $250,000 from the State General Fund for the fiscal year 2021-2022. This allocation is intended for the payment of a consent judgment resulting from the lawsuit 'James Geduldick v. Amanda Fagane et al.', which involves various parties, including the state of Louisiana and the Department of Transportation and Development. The bill stipulates that the payment shall cover principal, interest, court costs, and expert witness fees as awarded in the judgment. Furthermore, it emphasizes that the judgment shall take precedence over any conflicting provisions within the bill itself, ensuring that the terms of the judgment remain binding and enforceable.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HB 853 appears to be largely positive. It is viewed as a necessary step for the state to take in fulfilling its legal obligations, which can enhance public trust in the government's adherence to court rulings. There may be minimal dissent focused on the use of state funds for such judgments, but generally, it is understood that settling these legal matters promptly protects the state from further legal complications or additional financial liabilities. By prioritizing the resolution of this lawsuit, the state legislature aims to project an image of accountability and responsiveness.
Contention
Despite the positive outlook, the appropriation of funds for legal judgments can sometimes lead to criticisms regarding budget allocations and the prioritization of spending. Some legislators may question the necessity for a large financial commitment towards lawsuit settlements rather than being directed towards other pressing needs within the state, such as education or infrastructure. However, overall, the passage of HB 853 suggests a consensus on the importance of financial accountability in the realm of legal obligations, thereby promoting stability within state governance.
Appropriates funds for payment of the consent judgment against the state in the suit entitled James Geduldick v. Amanda Fagane et al. c/w Ronald L. Courtney and Rebecca L. Morris v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al.
Appropriates funds for payment of the consent judgment against the state in the suit entitled James Geduldick v. Amanda Fagane et al. c/w Ronald L. Courtney and Rebecca L. Morris v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al.
Appropriates funds for payment of the consent judgment against the state in the suit entitled Adam Fitzgerald et al. v. Andrew Scott Barker et al. c/w Reaka Windham v. Liberty Mutual et al.
Appropriates funds for payment of consent judgment against the state in the suit entitled Alma Gonzales Mora, et al v. Sidney Farrior, et al c/w Lee Mar v. The Hanover Insurance Company, et al
Appropriates funds for payment of judgment against the state of Louisiana in the suit entitled "Janelle Ford v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, et al"
Appropriates funds for payment of the consent judgment against the state in the suit entitled David L. Ocmand et al. v. Town of Brusly et al. c/w Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company v. the State of Louisiana c/w State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Com. v. the State of Louisiana
Appropriates funds for payment of the consent judgment against the state in the suit entitled David L. Ocmand et al. v. Town of Brusly et al. c/w Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company v. the State of Louisiana c/w State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Com. v. the State of Louisiana
Appropriates funds for payment of the consent judgment against the state in the suit entitled State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. and Alvin McMillian v. City of New Orleans, et al.