Louisiana 2022 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB149

Introduced
3/2/22  
Refer
3/2/22  
Refer
3/2/22  
Refer
3/14/22  
Refer
3/14/22  
Report Pass
4/5/22  
Report Pass
4/5/22  
Engrossed
4/13/22  
Engrossed
4/13/22  
Refer
4/18/22  

Caption

Provides for delictual actions. (8/1/22)

Impact

The implementation of SB 149 changes the landscape of injury liability in Louisiana by providing a longer timeframe for individuals to seek redress. The bill's stipulation that the prescriptive period commences on the day injury or damage is sustained aligns with the interests of accident victims, giving them more leeway in navigating their recovery. Importantly, it also offers protections for minors and persons of unsound mind, ensuring that the two-year limit does not adversely affect individuals unable to act due to their circumstances. This underscores the legislative intent to safeguard vulnerable populations while modernizing the prescriptive standards.

Summary

Senate Bill 149, enacted in Louisiana, introduces significant changes to the state's civil code regarding delictual actions, particularly those arising from injuries related to the operation of vehicles, aircraft, and watercraft. The bill extends the prescriptive period for such cases from one year to two years, allowing more time for victims to file claims. This amendment aims to provide better access to justice for individuals who suffer injuries in accidents, acknowledging the complexities and potential delays involved in legal processes following incidents of this nature.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB 149 appears to be positive among advocates for injured parties. Supporters view the extended period as a necessary adjustment that reflects the realities of injury claims that often require time for medical treatment and recovery before legal action can be considered. However, some stakeholders may express concerns regarding potential impacts on insurance companies and the implications of increased liabilities over a longer period, which could influence premiums and coverage decisions for policyholders.

Contention

The main points of contention regarding SB 149 relate to the implications of increasing the prescriptive period. Critics may argue that extending the period could lead to prolonged legal disputes and increased uncertainty for defendants, particularly in cases where evidence may deteriorate over time. Furthermore, the bill's subtle shift in liability standards, while advantageous for plaintiffs, may raise eyebrows among insurers and businesses that could face increased claims under the new rules. Balancing the needs of victims with the potential repercussions for businesses is a nuanced aspect of the discussion surrounding this legislative change.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2789

Health care practitioners: prescriptions: electronic data transmission.

CA AB852

Health care practitioners: electronic prescriptions.

CA AB149

Controlled substances: prescriptions.

TX SB594

Relating to the regulation of prescriptions for controlled substances, including certain procedures applicable to electronic prescriptions for Schedule II controlled substances.

TX HB2246

Relating to certain procedures applicable to electronic prescriptions for Schedule II controlled substances.

TX HB2766

Relating to electronic and other controlled substance prescriptions under the Texas Controlled Substances Act; authorizing a fee.