Provides relative to public adjuster fees. (1/1/23)
The enactment of SB186 is expected to have a substantial impact on the insurance industry, particularly for public adjusters. By allowing more leeway in the types of fees they can charge and the manner in which they can structure their contracts with clients, the bill aims to create a more competitive environment for public adjusters. The requirement for public adjusters to present multiple fee options to insured individuals is also intended to enhance transparency in the insurance claims process, ensuring that clients are well informed before entering into any agreements.
SB186, also referred to as the Public Adjuster Fees Act, aims to amend existing regulations surrounding how public adjusters charge for their services. The bill allows public adjusters to charge a range of fees, including flat fees, hourly rates, and percentage fees, with a cap that their fees cannot exceed 10% over the amount successfully paid by insurers. This change is significant as it repeals previous restrictions that rendered contingency fee agreements null and void, thus providing more flexibility for public adjusters in structuring their fees. The bill is set to take effect on January 1, 2023.
The general sentiment toward SB186 appears favorable among public adjusters and those advocating for increased consumer rights in insurance dealings. Proponents argue that the bill will benefit clients by allowing them to choose fee structures that best suit their needs, thus improving service outcomes. However, concerns have been raised about potential abuses of the fee structures, which could lead to inflated costs for clients if not properly regulated. This duality in sentiment highlights a tension between promoting flexibility and ensuring fairness in public adjusting services.
Notable points of contention revolve around the potential for ethical dilemmas that might arise due to the new fee structures. Critics argue that the ability to charge based on the success of claims could incentivize public adjusters to prioritize higher payouts over the best interests of clients. Further discussions during legislative sessions emphasized the need for oversight to prevent possible exploitation of consumers, particularly those who may not fully understand the implications of the fee arrangements being offered. Consequently, the bill's passage has been positioned as a pathway to modernizing public adjusting practices while maintaining the integrity of client relationships.