Louisiana 2022 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB278

Introduced
3/3/22  
Introduced
3/3/22  
Refer
3/3/22  
Refer
3/3/22  

Caption

Provides relative to the maximum cost of prescription insulin drugs. (8/1/22)

Impact

The enactment of SB 278 would have a significant impact on state healthcare regulations concerning prescription drug pricing, particularly insulin. By formalizing the maximum cost-sharing requirement, the bill aims to ensure that diabetics in Louisiana can access necessary medications without facing exorbitant costs. This law would apply to all new and existing health plans, thereby affecting a broad segment of the state's population. The requirement for compliance by August 1, 2022, indicates a push for immediate reform in drug pricing policies.

Summary

Senate Bill 278 aims to regulate the costs associated with prescription insulin drugs by establishing a maximum cost-sharing amount for patients. Specifically, the bill mandates that health plans or pharmacy benefit management plans limit the patient's out-of-pocket costs to no more than $100 for a 30-day supply of covered insulin drugs. This legislative initiative is a response to rising insulin prices and seeks to alleviate the financial burden on individuals managing diabetes. Additionally, the bill allows health plans to set lower cost-sharing requirements if they choose to do so, potentially providing further financial relief for patients.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB 278 appears to be positive among supporters who advocate for healthcare reforms aimed at making medicines more affordable. Various stakeholders, including healthcare providers and patient advocacy groups, highlight the bill as an important step in addressing the affordability crisis regarding chronic disease management, particularly for insulin-dependent diabetics. However, some concerns have been raised about the bill's implementation, specifically regarding how health plans will adapt and the potential implications for overall healthcare costs.

Contention

While the intent behind SB 278 is generally welcomed, there are notable points of contention worth mentioning. Critics of the bill have expressed concerns that the $100 cap might still leave some patients exposed to high costs, particularly those requiring multiple types of insulin or who have other complicating health conditions. Additionally, there are questions about the ability of pharmacy benefit managers to balance the cost-sharing with the need to cover the comprehensive range of prescription needs without raising overall premiums for consumers, which may spark future debates in legislative sessions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2863

Health care coverage: prescriptions.

CA AB852

Health care practitioners: electronic prescriptions.

CA AB2789

Health care practitioners: prescriptions: electronic data transmission.

IA SF383

A bill for an act relating to pharmacy benefits managers, pharmacies, prescription drugs, and pharmacy services administrative organizations, and including applicability provisions. (Formerly SSB 1074.) Effective date: 07/01/2025. Applicability date: 07/01/2025.

IA HF852

A bill for an act relating to pharmacy benefits managers, pharmacies, and prescription drugs and including applicability provisions.(Formerly HSB 99.)

IA SSB1074

A bill for an act relating to pharmacy benefits managers, pharmacies, and prescription drugs and including applicability provisions.(See SF 383.)

IA HSB99

A bill for an act relating to pharmacy benefits managers, pharmacies, and prescription drugs and including applicability provisions.(See HF 852.)

NM HB132

Mail-order & Community Pharmacy Access