Louisiana House Bill HB491

Louisiana 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/31/23
• Refer: 3/31/23
• Refer: 4/10/23

Caption

Repeals the automatic reduction in individual income tax rates and the corporation franchise tax rate if certain revenue thresholds are met (OR SEE FISC NOTE GF RV)

Impact

By repealing the provisions for automatic tax rate reductions, HB 491 positions the state to maintain current tax rates regardless of fluctuations in revenue collections. Proponents of the bill argue that removing these automatic reductions will promote more stable state finances and provide predictability in budgeting. On the other hand, opponents may argue that this repeal could undermine calls for tax relief, particularly for individual taxpayers and businesses who might benefit from lower tax rates during prosperous fiscal years.

Summary

House Bill 491, introduced by Representative Marcelle, seeks to repeal the automatic reductions in individual income tax rates and the corporation franchise tax rate that are triggered when state revenue reaches certain thresholds. The current law requires that if income tax collections exceed previous fiscal records, the rates will be decreased accordingly. This bill aims to eliminate this provision, which could have significant implications for state tax revenue and budgeting processes.

Sentiment

The sentiment regarding HB 491 appears to be mixed. Supporters posit that the bill will help prevent potential revenue shortfalls that could result from unexpected tax rate reductions, particularly as the state navigates fiscal challenges. Conversely, critics suggest that repealing automatic reductions removes a proactive approach to tax relief, potentially exacerbating burdens on taxpayers when state finances are stable or growing. This reveals a fundamental divide over fiscal policy in terms of taxation and revenue management.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB 491 include the debate over the balance between maintaining robust state revenues and providing tax relief to residents and businesses. Stakeholders on both sides may raise concerns about how the repeal will affect economic growth and development, with advocates for tax reductions arguing that lower taxes can stimulate investment and spending, while those favoring revenue stability argue that consistent funding is critical for state services and programs.