Louisiana House Bill HB178

Louisiana 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/8/13
• Refer: 4/8/13

Caption

Repeals corporation income and franchise taxes (OR -$79,000,000 GF RV See Note)

Impact

If enacted, HB 178 would fundamentally alter the tax landscape for businesses in Louisiana. It could potentially lead to a decrease in state revenues by an estimated $79 million annually, which raises concerns about how this reduction in tax income will affect state-funded services and programs. Proponents argue that the repeal would encourage new businesses to establish operations in Louisiana and incentivize existing businesses to expand, thereby stimulating economic growth and job creation. However, the long-term fiscal implications of such a substantial tax cut remain a point of contention among lawmakers.

Summary

House Bill 178, proposed by Representative Talbot, aims to repeal both the corporation income tax and franchise tax in Louisiana. This legislation signifies a shift in the state's approach to business taxation, proposing the complete removal of these taxes effective January 1, 2014. By eliminating the corporation income tax, which levies rates based on the taxable income of corporations, and the franchise tax, which is based on corporate capital, the bill intends to foster a more favorable environment for businesses operating within the state.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 178 is mixed. Supporters, primarily from the business community and some Republican legislators, advocate that repealing these taxes will enhance the state's attractiveness to investors and job creators. They argue that a more competitive tax structure will ultimately benefit the state's economy as a whole. Conversely, critics, including some Democratic legislators, express concerns about the potential loss of essential services funded by these tax revenues. The debate highlights a broader discussion on the balance between supporting business growth and ensuring adequate funding for public services.

Contention

Notable points of contention in the discussions surrounding HB 178 include concerns about fairness and revenue stability. Critics have argued that the burden of funding state services may unfairly shift to individual taxpayers and smaller businesses, who may not benefit from such tax cuts. Additionally, there are fears that the absence of corporate taxes could lead to underfunded public resources, including education and infrastructure, which could hinder long-term economic growth. The fiscal responsibility of such significant tax alterations raises serious questions among lawmakers about how to maintain a balanced budget while promoting business development.