Creates a state wide database for individuals convicted of child abuse/neglect. (7/1/24) (EN +$490,135 GF EX See Note)
Impact
The implications of SB217 are significant for state laws, particularly those that govern local governments’ ability to enforce supplementary business regulations. The bill aims to amend existing legislation to ensure that state laws are the prevailing authority, effectively preempting local ordinances. This could have wide-ranging effects on how local governments manage issues such as zoning, environmental standards, and labor laws, potentially reducing their ability to address unique community needs that extend beyond state mandates.
Summary
SB217 aims to streamline the existing regulations governing business operations across the state by imposing uniform standards and limiting the power of local governments to create additional regulations. This bill seeks to eliminate potential conflicts between state law and local ordinances, thus simplifying the regulatory landscape for businesses and encouraging economic engagement. Proponents believe that such uniformity will reduce compliance burdens on businesses that operate in multiple local jurisdictions, leading to more efficient economic development across the state.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding SB217 appears to be polarized among stakeholders. Supporters, primarily from the business community and some legislative members, argue that it fosters a conducive environment for business growth by diminishing regulatory complexities. Conversely, critics—including local government representatives and advocacy groups—argue that it encroaches on local governance and could lead to a one-size-fits-all approach that may not suit the diverse needs of various communities. This divide illustrates a broader tension between state centralization and local autonomy in governance.
Contention
Notable points of contention in the discussions around SB217 include the potential erosion of local control and the loss of tailored regulations meant to address specific community issues. Opponents of the bill express concerns that the centralization of regulatory authority at the state level may undermine public welfare initiatives and limit local responsiveness to citizens' needs. There is a strong dialogue about the appropriateness of state intervention in local matters, with some arguing that local governments should retain the flexibility to craft regulations that reflect their unique contexts.
Provides relative to parole for persons convicted of certain crimes of violence and provides for the creation and administration of the Programs to Reduce Recidivism Fund (OR DECREASE GF EX See Note)
Adds the crimes of human trafficking and trafficking of children for sexual purposes to the list of sex offenses and crimes of violence (EN INCREASE GF EX See Note)
Mental health: other; inclusion of mental health and substance use disorder services with the Michigan crisis and access line; provide for. Amends secs. 151 & 165 of 1974 PA 258 (MCL 330.1151 & 330.1165).