Provides relative to the review of agency rules (EN NO IMPACT See Note)
Impact
The implementation of HB 109 is expected to streamline bureaucratic procedures and improve the efficiency of state agencies. By facilitating public comments on rules deemed outdated or burdensome, the bill promotes transparency and encourages active participation from citizens in governmental decision-making. The creation of an online portal for public feedback is a significant step toward making administrative practices more accessible and responsive to the needs of the community.
Summary
House Bill 109 focuses on enhancing the review process of agency rules and increasing public engagement in governmental oversight. The bill mandates that every state agency conduct a comprehensive review of its rules every five years. This review aims to identify rules that are unnecessary, overly complex, or inconsistent with legal standards and the agency's mission. The findings from these reviews must be presented in an annual report to the legislative oversight committees, thereby promoting greater accountability in the administrative processes of government agencies.
Sentiment
The general sentiment surrounding HB 109 appears to be favorable among legislators and advocacy groups advocating for government transparency and citizen engagement. Supporters argue that the bill represents a progressive approach to governance by allowing citizens a voice in policymaking, which is essential for a functioning democracy. However, there may be concerns regarding the operational challenges this bill may pose for agencies tasked with collecting and processing public comments, alongside their existing responsibilities.
Contention
Primary contention points related to HB 109 include the adequacy of resources agencies have to comply with the regular reviews and public comment mechanisms it mandates. Critics may argue that while the bill aims to reduce bureaucratic red tape, it could inadvertently create additional burdens on state agencies. Moreover, there may be debates about how effectively the public's comments will be integrated into agency rulemaking processes and whether agencies will be equipped to handle increased public interaction.
Provides relative to utilization review standards and approval procedures for healthcare service claims submitted by healthcare providers (EN NO IMPACT See Note)
Provides for technical corrections beyond the authority of the Louisiana State Law Institute to certain citations in the Administrative Procedure Act as amended by Act 211 of the 2021 Regular Session and Act 663 of the 2022 Regular Session. (gov sig)